You are funny...It's entertaining, this pitting Scripture against clear NT doctrine concerning women's role. "Hey, wait, Deborah!" "Hey, wait, there was a deaconess (not really) in Acts!"
Last edited:
You are funny...It's entertaining, this pitting Scripture against clear NT doctrine concerning women's role. "Hey, wait, Deborah!" "Hey, wait, there was a deaconess (not really) in Acts!"
Your funny...
LOL...keep them coming.It's what they do...
Don't like it? Well, find a verse somewhere to pit against it. People do it all the time.
It's entertaining, this pitting Scripture against clear NT doctrine concerning women's role. "Hey, wait, Deborah!" "Hey, wait, there was a deaconess (not really) in Acts!"
Nowhere in the Bible does it say God chose a woman to prophesy or teach. Nowhere in the Bible does it say our Lord Jesus chose a woman to prophesy or teach. The one place in the Bible where a woman tried to assume authority, she was turned into a leper (Num. 12:10). In the Bible, leprosy is not considered a disease or illness. It is called being unclean.
Yes, hey wait, Deborah. The claim was [see below] NOWHERE IN THE BIBLE DOES IT SAY GOD CHOSE A WOMAN TO PROPHESY.
And it's a fallacy.
Nowhere in the Bible does it say God chose a woman to prophesy or teach. Nowhere in the Bible does it say our Lord Jesus chose a woman to prophesy or teach. The one place in the Bible where a woman tried to assume authority, she was turned into a leper (Num. 12:10). In the Bible, leprosy is not considered a disease or illness. It is called being unclean.
She was a prophet nonetheless and she wasn't the only one. The Lord uses women too, get over it.
So you accuse me of spreading false doctrine twice, and cannot substantiate it in either case. Instead, you dismiss me.
No further comment.
I did substantiate it with scripture at least twice, you're just unwilling to believe in it. And don't sit there and cry "slander", when you have been the one doing all the "slander" all along.
Here are a few of your comments. Slander plus blasphemy.
"More dogma from a King James onlyist" post 2112
Because, after all, 1 Speculations 3:8 declares plainly that "women may not be pastors". post 2113
Not only are you really missing out, it also explains your dogmatism on so many issues. post 2131
Anyone that defends this guy is not defending any wisdom in the Bible. He has declared the Bible to be dogmatic at least twice after being given it's scripture. Then he has the gall to cry out "slander" against someone else.
Miriam became a leper because she spoke against Moses marrying an Ethiopian woman.
Also, the daughters of Philip, the evangelist, were prophetess. (Acts 21:9)
Yes, he uses women and sends men.
I did substantiate it with scripture at least twice, you're just unwilling to believe in it. And don't sit there and cry "slander", when you have been the one doing all the "slander" all along.
Here are a few of your comments. Slander plus blasphemy.
"More dogma from a King James onlyist" post 2112
Because, after all, 1 Speculations 3:8 declares plainly that "women may not be pastors". post 2113
Not only are you really missing out, it also explains your dogmatism on so many issues. post 2131
Anyone that defends this guy is not defending any wisdom in the Bible. He has declared the Bible to be dogmatic at least twice after being given it's scripture. Then he has the gall to cry out "slander" against someone else.
Miriam became a leper because she spoke against Moses marrying an Ethiopian woman.
Also, the daughters of Philip, the evangelist, were prophetess. (Acts 21:9)
The LORD never mentioned Mose's wife when He spoke to Aaron and Miriam, but that he was more than a prophet, because the LORD spoke to him mouth to mouth. I imagine only Miriam was afflicted because Aaron had some claim to being more like Moses from the time when Moses told the LORD he was slow of speech, and of a slow tongue.
Let's see... you quoted some words with the comment accusing me of spreading heresy. You were incorrect, having attributed to me the statements of another contributor. Initially you apologized, but immediately accused me again. I challenged you to substantiate your accusation by quoting me in regard to the specific accusation. You haven't done so. Instead you come back with this silliness.
If you are really 93 and have been a Christian for nearly eight decades, why do you still act like a petulant teenager? It's high time you act your "claimed" age, demonstrate at least some fruit of the Spirit, and get some integrity.
110 pages, and what has been accomplished? absolutely nothing.
Holy Spirit is the only One who can change our hearts/minds. I say we all leave it to Him to do the work.
agree to disagree and move on.