Yes. That was a red herring to begin with, and I already told the poster that Jewish interpretations are irrelevant. Before the first advent of Christ, the Jewish rabbis had already built up a system of interpretation which went against what God had revealed. Therefore when Christ exposed their false teachings, the chief priests, scribes, Pharisees, and lawyers became enemies of Christ and plotted His demise. After 70 AD, Jewish rabbis doubled down on their false beliefs and enshrined them in the Talmud. So Christians have nothing to do with Jewish interpretations. They rejected their own true Messiah because of their own false beliefs, and Christ pronounced woes upon all of them.
Of course this is the world of the scholar and experts on the manuscripts because these writings help them even with word meaning from ancient Hebrew and Greek text. Knowing how they used certain words is helpful in ascertaining the authors intended meaning of a word. Those ancient Rabbinical writings are some of the best examples from the time.
And not all their interpretations were wrong. I would think it would be of value to research what various ancient Jewish interpretations exist concerning Gen 3:16. Reading them is not going to taint you. You would be able to recognize which ones are getting it and which ones are off target. There were oral traditions that seem to be repeated by Jesus. Where did the information about Abrahams Bosom come from? I think you can only find that in some of the rabbinical writings from the time.
- 1
- 1
- Show all