Is Charismatic A Cult?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Status
Not open for further replies.

1ofthem

Senior Member
Mar 30, 2016
3,729
1,912
113
#61
Psst ... Jesus never spoke in tongues.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
I don't know if he did or didn't...

But he did say this about tongues in Mark 16:17
And these signs shall follow them that believe; In my name shall they cast out devils; they shall speak with new tongues;
 
Nov 22, 2015
20,436
1,430
0
#62
I don't think we can label a group of people as being a "cult" because some people may have looked down on others because of a difference of opinion on a faith/scriptural issues. If that was true 3/4's of us here would be a "cult"...lol
 
L

LaurenTM

Guest
#63
Psst ... Jesus never spoke in tongues.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
this thread is not about tongues Roger

it would be very considerate of you if you managed to not take it there...although it seems you have been spoiling for it
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#64
It is Impossible to have the Spirit of Christ that is born from the incorruptible seed as God's word any other way other than believing God, not seen .

If we had the authority of God as that which we can see with our eyes as something we could outwardly as a display, a sign.......... we (fill in the blank)?

I would suggest make the faith of God(who remains without form) without effect
uh.....no-o-o-o-o-o....God the Son has the form of a MAN at this time.
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
#65
I don't know if he did or didn't...

But he did say this about tongues in Mark 16:17
And these signs shall follow them that believe; In my name shall they cast out devils; they shall speak with new tongues;
Did He? Or did a scribe add that to the end of Mark? If it is out of context with the rest of scripture then it could be and addition from man.

There is not a reference where Jesus spoke in tongues or told others to speak in tongues. Jesus taught prayer but not tongues. If Jesus taught His disciples to pray because it was important and they asked Him then why not teach them to speak or pray in tongues?

Jesus gave us an example to how to live and serve but nothing on tongues.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 

melita916

Senior Member
Aug 12, 2011
10,440
2,673
113
#66
i took a cults awareness class in college. i don't remember the exact definition that was used for class. what i remember is when a group branches out from a "mainstream" religion. one of the main factors (if not THE main factor) that would define a cult is the group denies the deity of Christ.

this is what i remember from class.
 
L

LaurenTM

Guest
#67
Psst ... Jesus never spoke in tongues.

For the cause of Christ
Roger


pssst...

it is clear He already had the approval of God when the Holy Spirit descended upon Him in the form of a dove after He was baptized

however, it seems the first evidence of speaking in tongues was on the day of Pentecost...see the book of Acts (of the Apostles)


Those who knew the scriptures knew Him.

well that is certainly not truthful

the ones who knew the scriptures the best, including Paul while he was yet Saul, TOTALLY DENIED Him

because they were basing their understanding on human comprehension of who and what they thought God should be doing with regards to the Roman occupation

something very similar to folks today who think they understand but are in actual denial

AGAIN...this thread is not about tongues Roger!!!!
 
B

BeyondET

Guest
#68
Those who knew the scriptures knew Him.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
If you mean the Scriptures that spoke of His coming? most topics He discussed wasn't written.

IMO was Jesus Charismatic I think so, people came from all around in the hundreds even thousands to see Him and hear Him and a lot of those folks where amazed of His teachings.
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
#69
this thread is not about tongues Roger

it would be very considerate of you if you managed to not take it there...although it seems you have been spoiling for it
What better describe charismatics than tongues but I've got no problem with not going into depth about the abuse of tongues in the charismatic movement.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 
Nov 22, 2015
20,436
1,430
0
#70
i took a cults awareness class in college. i don't remember the exact definition that was used for class. what i remember is when a group branches out from a "mainstream" religion. one of the main factors (if not THE main factor) that would define a cult is the group denies the deity of Christ.

this is what i remember from class.
I agree with this. I would also say that to not say that the blood of Jesus is what brings redemption and the forgiveness of sins would be a biggie for me too.

There are thousands of denominations that have some form of a works-based salvation system but that to me is not a deal-breaker as long as they have received Christ as their sacrifice for sins initially.

I would dare say that there are none of us that are living now with total dependence on Christ's work which is by grace through faith alone in our everyday lives.
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#71


you know, RIGHTLY dividing the word of truth is what we should be doing

for example, since God Himself distributes the gifts through His Spirit, is He going against His word?

Jesus WAS crucified and is now RISEN...when Paul says he preaches Jesus crucified, he is not leaving Him on the cross,,,so saying we all walk around carrying a cross is not what we should be doing and not what is intended



well actually, no...not at all in fact! THIS is your personal interpretation but it does not hold true in light of the whole counsel of scripture...which people who wish to uphold personal opinions, private teaching and tradition, will resort to in order to comfort themselves with the thought that they are secure in what they believe, while taking aim at those who have a different view or perhaps even a better biblical perspective

first of all, Jesus Himself was a sign and gave many signs...there are signs FROM GOD who follow after those who believe...I guess you get no signs if you do not believe...that is from God Himself

These signs will accompany those who have believed: in My name they will cast out demons, they will speak with new tongues Mark 16:17

(yes I know some consider that verse as an addition, but equally so, many do not...so that is another conversation...anyway, does not matter as Acts is replete with proof of the truth of that verse...as well as Paul's letters etc)

A lack of faith on the part of one individual does not cancel out the biblical injunction to be filled and to be being filled with the Holy Spirit of God. This, is more than a suggestion as we have no power apart from the Holy Spirit

These attacks on the Holy Spirit, because that is truly what they are, are clothed with the suggestion that God has somehow decided, apparently apart from what is written, to remove the authority of the believer IN Him, and have us thump our Bibles instead with no resolve other than our own

in other words, your post is not enlightened and not supported by scripture
the signs and wonders performed by the apostles have ceased, exactly as paul said they would.
we have what Timothy and Titus had (without Paul):


2 Timothy 4
Preach the Word
1I charge you in the presence of God and of Christ Jesus, who is to judge the living and the dead, and by his appearing and his kingdom: 2preach the word; be ready in season and out of season; reprove, rebuke, and exhort, with complete patience and teaching. 3For the time is coming when people will not endure sounda teaching, but having itching ears they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own passions, 4and will turn away from listening to the truth and wander off into myths. 5As for you, always be sober-minded, endure suffering, do the work of an evangelist, fulfill your ministry.
and more so:

2 Timothy 3:10
You, however, have observed my teaching, my conduct, my purpose, my faith, my patience, my love, my endurance,

Titus 1:13
This testimony is true. Therefore rebuke them sternly, so that they will be sound in the faith,

Titus 2:15
Speak these things as you encourage and rebuke with all authority. Let no one despise you.

....................

2 Timothy 3
All Scripture Is Breathed Out by God

10You, however, have followed my teaching, my conduct, my aim in life, my faith, my patience, my love, my steadfastness, 11my persecutions and sufferings that happened to me at Antioch, at Iconium, and at Lystra—which persecutions I endured; yet from them all the Lord rescued me. 12Indeed, all who desire to live a godly life in Christ Jesus will be persecuted, 13while evil people and impostors will go on from bad to worse, deceiving and being deceived. 14But as for you, continue in what you have learned and have firmly believed, knowing from whoma you learned it 15and how from childhood you have been acquainted with the sacred writings, which are able to make you wise for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus. 16All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, 17that the man of Godb may be complete, equipped for every good work.
 
L

LaurenTM

Guest
#72
What better describe charismatics than tongues but I've got no problem with not going into depth about the abuse of tongues in the charismatic movement.

For the cause of Christ
Roger

yet again Roger...this is about whether or not Charismatics are members of a cult

your personal agenda would most likely best be suited to a thread on tongues...of which there are many and most full of your opinions

do you have a reason you wish to divert the entire thread YOUR way?

the thread should stay on track as it is a question that evokes thought and discussion...the topic you seem to wish to discuss, has been talked to death
 

1ofthem

Senior Member
Mar 30, 2016
3,729
1,912
113
#73
Did He? Or did a scribe add that to the end of Mark? If it is out of context with the rest of scripture then it could be and addition from man.

There is not a reference where Jesus spoke in tongues or told others to speak in tongues. Jesus taught prayer but not tongues. If Jesus taught His disciples to pray because it was important and they asked Him then why not teach them to speak or pray in tongues?

Jesus gave us an example to how to live and serve but nothing on tongues.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
I kinda figured that one was coming. But if we start letting everyone just pick out verses they don't like and say scribes wrote them, there wouldn't be much of a Bible left...would there?
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#74
I don't know if he did or didn't...

But he did say this about tongues in Mark 16:17
And these signs shall follow them that believe; In my name shall they cast out devils; they shall speak with new tongues;
tongues means languages, like French and German.
nothing else.
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
#75
pssst...

it is clear He already had the approval of God when the Holy Spirit descended upon Him in the form of a dove after He was baptized

however, it seems the first evidence of speaking in tongues was on the day of Pentecost...see the book of Acts (of the Apostles)
Jesus had the approval of God before He left heaven even before the world was created. Still if tongues were that important Jesus would have taught them to the apostles and to the disciples.
well that is certainly not truthful

the ones who knew the scriptures the best, including Paul while he was yet Saul, TOTALLY DENIED Him

because they were basing their understanding on human comprehension of who and what they thought God should be doing with regards to the Roman occupation

something very similar to folks today who think they understand but are in actual denial

AGAIN...this thread is not about tongues Roger!!!!
Paul thought he knew everything not unlike the religionists of today. What did Peter say?

Joh 6:69 And we believe and are sure that thou art that Christ, the Son of the living God.

The Pharisees were blinded but the people, the humble fishermen knew Him.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 
L

LaurenTM

Guest
#76
the signs and wonders performed by the apostles have ceased, exactly as paul said they would.
we have what Timothy and Titus had (without Paul)
no doubt if that is what you think

so do you think Charismatics are cult members?

I provided a good link some posts back that describes a cult ...

maybe we should try and stay on topic
 
Aug 15, 2009
9,745
179
0
#77
I don't think we can label a group of people as being a "cult" because some people may have looked down on others because of a difference of opinion on a faith/scriptural issues. If that was true 3/4's of us here would be a "cult"...lol
Yeeeeeeah..... wouldn't they now?
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
#78
yet again Roger...this is about whether or not Charismatics are members of a cult

your personal agenda would most likely best be suited to a thread on tongues...of which there are many and most full of your opinions

do you have a reason you wish to divert the entire thread YOUR way?

the thread should stay on track as it is a question that evokes thought and discussion...the topic you seem to wish to discuss, has been talked to death
Don't connect the dots. Just don't do it.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 
L

LaurenTM

Guest
#79
Oh no worries Roger...I not only connect dots...I see them coming and the subject you keep trying to deflect the thread with, results in plenty of little circular reasonings...not interested...

here is the op again:


Is Charismatic A Cult?

i was wondering if it is since i have always thought that it is a bit... different (in a bad way)

any opinions on this?​
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
#80
If you mean the Scriptures that spoke of His coming? most topics He discussed wasn't written.

IMO was Jesus Charismatic I think so, people came from all around in the hundreds even thousands to see Him and hear Him and a lot of those folks where amazed of His teachings.
The Holy Spirit gave Jesus the charisma to speak the truth and the people received it gladly. The word charisma has been corrupted to apply to differently today than when Jesus was here.

An orator who speaks charismatically is not the same as a charismatic in the charismatic movement.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 
Status
Not open for further replies.