C
Acts 2,8,16 are not folly but prove lost "dead men" can do something. Why would Peter command his listeners in Acts 2 to repent and be baptized if Peter knew there was no possible way for them to obey that command? The command itself implies ability and responsibility upon those lost people to choose to obey that command...which some chose to do.
You also post "Men can do nothing of Spiritual merit apart from Gods Spirit moving and giving Light that they might turn from darkness to His marvelous Light."
If this were true, then all those lost will be all 100% God's fault and blame for not "moving" His Spirit upon them. This reeks of Calvinism.
You also post "Men can do nothing of Spiritual merit apart from Gods Spirit moving and giving Light that they might turn from darkness to His marvelous Light."
If this were true, then all those lost will be all 100% God's fault and blame for not "moving" His Spirit upon them. This reeks of Calvinism.