KILLINGS OF PALESTINIAN CIVILIANS BY ISRAELI FORCES

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Dec 18, 2013
6,733
45
0
...any ideas to be even more careful without sacrificing their own citizens and their own lives?
Last I seen Israel has recommended another temporary humanitarian ceasefire proposal. This seems to be a good idea.

If it be possible I'd recommend at the least for Hamas and Israel to agree not to target or use as shields some UN buildings so at least women and children can have a safe refuge. Granted I doubt either side listen to this suggestion given the news, but that would be my suggestion.
 

JaumeJ

Senior Member
Jul 2, 2011
21,282
6,567
113
I understand what you are saying. My heart is always taken to some of the words in the following quote.



Joh 18:36
Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence.

Joh 18:37
Pilate therefore said unto him, Art thou a king then? Jesus answered, Thou sayest that I am a king. To this end was I born, and for this cause came I into the world, that I should bear witness unto the truth. Every one that is of the truth heareth my voice.




I would just like to say that as a Canadian, I abhor violence of all types. I do not believe in people carrying guns, because it promotes violence. I like to point to Japan as an example of what prohibiting guns can do. 2 murders with guns in 2012, for example.

A Land Without Guns: How Japan Has Virtually Eliminated Shooting Deaths - Max Fisher - The Atlantic

That being said, I do understand there is such a thing as a "just" war. World Wars I and II being examples of that. When a dictator is given or seizes control of a country, and that country begins to eliminate its own citizens, or commit to conquering other lands, I do believe that other countries have the right to intervene.

I feel for both sides in this conflict. Many Palestinians are being daily killed. Whether by the Israelis or their own misfired rockets, I do not know! Israelis are also being killed.

My biggest objection to the objections to this post, is simply that is modern day Israel REALLY the fulfillment of Bible prophecy? It is actually a secular state. And many of the citizens of Israel are in fact, Jewish atheists. I have read sources that say between 19% to 37% self identify with atheism.

So is modern day Israel a land established by God, or a land of sanctuary for European Jews, who were escaping persecution after World War II and also from states like Russia, which treated them shamefully?

I personally don't know. I do know, they don't call themselves "Israelites." They call themselves "Israelis" to distinguish between the Bible Jews and the modern day state. A small difference, perhaps, but one that does give one pause to think. Because the Israelis themselves are doing something new.

Of course, there are many legitimate Jewish believers in Israel, who are the descendants of the Pharisees. You remember, the ones who rejected Jesus. The Pharisees were the only survivors after the temple was destroyed in 70 AD, and the Jews dispersed. And one of the things they did after that was write the Talmud, a list of even more rules and regulations than the 613 in the Old Testament. So basically, the Jewish religion and temple worship was destroyed by Titus in 70 AD. And why? Because Jesus fulfilled the law, and the rituals weren't required any more.

"If perfection could have been attained through the Levitical priesthood—and indeed the law given to the people established that priesthood—why was there still need for another priest to come, one in the order of Melchizedek, not in the order of Aaron? [SUP]12 [/SUP]For when the priesthood is changed, the law must be changed also. [SUP]13 [/SUP]He of whom these things are said belonged to a different tribe, and no one from that tribe has ever served at the altar. [SUP]14 [/SUP]For it is clear that our Lord descended from Judah, and in regard to that tribe Moses said nothing about priests. [SUP]15 [/SUP]And what we have said is even more clear if another priest like Melchizedek appears, [SUP]16 [/SUP]one who has become a priest not on the basis of a regulation as to his ancestry but on the basis of the power of an indestructible life" Hebrews 7:11-16.

So ancestry, according to Hebrews, means nothing since Jesus died on the cross, and rose from the dead and ascended to heaven. There is no NEED for a temple, sacrifices or the Old Covenant, which the religious modern day Jews represent.

"But in fact the ministry Jesus has received is as superior to theirs as the covenant of which he is mediator is superior to the old one, since the new covenant is established on better promises." Hebrews 8:6

However, this does not mean I do not have any sympathies for the Israelis, and the terrorist war which is being conducted by Hamas. In fact, I have seen pictures of the underground tunnels found by the Egyptians, used to bring in war materials, and to enter Israel in the future. Something in the area of over 1600 of them. The modern day Jews were horribly persecuted, and my memory of history is that neither Canada nor the US allowed them to dock their leaky boats when they escaped Europe and the Holocaust. So whether they are the fulfillment of Scripture, I doubt, but they do need a country of their own. So I do support the concept of Israel in the Middle East, since no one else was willing to give them a country.

So where does that leave the Palestinians? Well, some are Christians, which many seem to forget. I had a friend who was a Christian Palestinian Israeli, and she was persecuted. She finally immigrated to Australia, where her mother and father had long ago left for. But I will say, she was totally ignorant of the Bible, and I was able to share with her what being a Christian was really about. It was NOT about whether the Catholic or the Eastern Orthodox church was the "true" church, but rather that Jesus died for her sins.

And the Muslim Palestinians, what about them? Well, I do believe, if I read history correctly, that many left their houses and lands, when told by the other Arab countries they would get back their homes after the Arab/Muslim countries destroyed Israel right after Partition. And they were never let back in, or they didn't want back in till the Jews were gone. Not sure about that. Finding good sources is part of my issue.

I do know that the Palestinians, despite propaganda, were given homes, schools and hospitals. They were given land back by the Israelis. But they never have acknowledged it. Instead, they have been used as pawns by the terrorists organizations, to further their own agenda of destroying Israel.

So I am really on the fence, seeing two very real sides to this story. But right now, the thing that bothers me most, as a Canadian, is seeing the defense of Hamas in the media, and the way Obama has totally sided with the Muslims, including such things as huge arms sales to Saudi Arabia, where the militant Wahhabis are stationed. So how much of those arms end up in the hands of Hamas? Even Egypt has turned on Hamas, which was supposedly a spin off of the Muslim Brotherhood.

A very complex situation in the Middle East today, which I find very scary, in terms of the killings going on, the future of these areas for both Israel and the Palestinians.

Personally, I do favour a two state concept for the Middle East. But sadly, as many have pointed out, Hamas and many of the Arab countries do not. So the war is going to continue. And how long? Given that this war has gone on since Israel was created in 1948, 66 years ago, I do not see it ending soon. I also remember reading some of Hal Lindsay's prophecies as a young Christian, and that it would be one generation after 1948 till Jesus returned. Since a generation was 40 years, it seems like we are well past that point.

Anyway, I don't usually speak about American politics, it has gotten me in a lot of trouble on FB. But it does seem to me like Obama is part of the cause of this session of war in the Middle East, because he has not taken a strong stand on this issue, unlike Prime Minister Harper, (Canadian Prime Minister!) who actually called on Obama to stand with Israel, our traditional ally. Obama never answered Harper.

And no, not the whole cause, for sure! Anyway, just my two cents of straddling the Canadian fence for peace. There are arguments on both sides, and no doubt too many people have been killed already. And I am offering no solutions, except for the traditional Canadian one that we have tried to always take as peace keepers, to settle without war, if possible.

PS. Please don't jump on me and tell me that the "other" side does not want peace. So far, from everything I have read, it seems like the Hamas side is the less likely side with peace. And I do not identify all Palestinians with Hamas, for sure!
 
J

jahsoul

Guest
What a load of crap.....everything they gained they gave back after Egypt recognized Israel and signed a peace treaty with them. Even Wiki gets it right on this one.....mostly. Six-Day War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The only thing returned was Sinai; East Jerusalem/West Bank & Golan Heights remained. But I guess that's considered everything right?
 
J

jahsoul

Guest
Pure Smoke.

Sorry, I don't read Palestinian revisionist history books.

Again this war would not be if Hamas was not the initiator, the aggressor and continues to break/turn down truces.
I hate to tell you crossnote but that is undeniable history. The state of israel attacked Egypt first and I'm 100% certain you have nothing to dispute that fact.
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,727
3,661
113
I hate to tell you crossnote but that is undeniable history. The state of israel attacked Egypt first and I'm 100% certain you have nothing to dispute that fact.
Again this war would not be if Hamas was not the initiator, the aggressor and continues to break/turn down truces.
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,727
3,661
113
Last I seen Israel has recommended another temporary humanitarian ceasefire proposal. This seems to be a good idea.

If it be possible I'd recommend at the least for Hamas and Israel to agree not to target or use as shields some UN buildings so at least women and children can have a safe refuge. Granted I doubt either side listen to this suggestion given the news, but that would be my suggestion.
I half way disagree, Hamas would predictably place launchers near civilian targets and Israel would comply until they see they are being targeted by those launchers.
 
S

Sirk

Guest
Not only that crossnote but how many Hamas rockets fall short and land on gaza neighborhoods?
 
J

jahsoul

Guest
Just like how the 6 Day War wouldn't have happened if Egypt didn't send an air strike on the state of israel. Oh yeah, that turned out to be a lie, didn't it?
Pure Smoke.

Sorry, I don't read Palestinian revisionist history books.
Again, what you replied to was my comment about the Six Day War, calling my comment "Pure Smoke," and said that you don't read revisionist history. Why did you try to make my reply about the last thing that you said?
 
S

Sirk

Guest
Because jahsoil. Israel's preemptive action was Israel taking the initiative against an imminent threat verifiable by Egyptian troops massing on the boarder as well as intelligence gleaned by Israeli intelligence services. If someone is gonna attack your house and you know about it are you gonna sit on your hands.....twiddle your thumbs? Hope for the best? That is why your assertion is smoke as well as a giant load of manure.
 
J

jahsoul

Guest
Just like how the 6 Day War wouldn't have happened if Egypt didn't send an air strike on the state of israel. Oh yeah, that turned out to be a lie, didn't it?
Because jahsoil. Israel's preemptive action was Israel taking the initiative against an imminent threat verifiable by Egyptian troops massing on the boarder as well as intelligence gleaned by Israeli intelligence services. If someone is gonna attack your house and you know about it are you gonna sit on your hands.....twiddle your thumbs? Hope for the best? That is why your assertion is smoke as well as a giant load of manure.
So again, who do we have to blow up for the USS Liberty incident? If the state of israel felt as strong about you do about the start of the war, why did they lie and tell the world that Egypt attacked them? You remember the saying, once a liar; makes you wonder what else they lied about to play a victim. *rubs chin*

But again, I don't overlook the deed of one over another base of a misguided belief.

As an aside, you comment still doesn't jibe with what I said. I didn't make any mention of reasons the state of israel had for attacking Egypt. I brought up the fact that they lied about it. But I guess that fact falls into the category of smoke and a giant load of manure, huh?
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,727
3,661
113
Again, what you replied to was my comment about the Six Day War, calling my comment "Pure Smoke," and said that you don't read revisionist history. Why did you try to make my reply about the last thing that you said?
Because my first comment about Hamas related to the present war...this thread relates to the present war...then you come along with your smoke machine and try to divert the present topic to a historic topic in 1967 when my brain was also filled with smoke.
 
S

Sirk

Guest
What do you mean they lied? Did they blame it on a you tube video that degraded Mohammad (can I say that name) and it was a spontaneous uprising with the only difference being that they actually protected their people?
 
J

jahsoul

Guest
Because my first comment about Hamas related to the present war...this thread relates to the present war...then you come along with your smoke machine and try to divert the present topic to a historic topic in 1967 when my brain was also filled with smoke.
I was just paralleling the situations, showing that both sides can make claims to whose at fault, and people can believe which narrative they want.
 
J

jahsoul

Guest
What do you mean they lied? Did they blame it on a you tube video that degraded Mohammad (can I say that name) and it was a spontaneous uprising with the only difference being that they actually protected their people?
Actually, they lied by saying that Egypt started the airstrike. Many reputable sources state this.
 
S

Sirk

Guest
The wiki page accurately depicts why Israel launched an air strike on the Egyptian Air Force.
 
J

jahsoul

Guest
The wiki page accurately depicts why Israel launched an air strike on the Egyptian Air Force.
The wiki page also accurately states that they lied about it
 
S

Sirk

Guest
Lie about what. That they closed the straight and Israel considered it an act of war? Or that Egypt was massing troops on their southern border. You have a glitch in your program.
 
Dec 18, 2013
6,733
45
0
I half way disagree, Hamas would predictably place launchers near civilian targets and Israel would comply until they see they are being targeted by those launchers.
Yes this is true indeed, this is why I doubt either side, mostly Hamas, would comply with such a plan. It's a sad thing when a complete foreigner cares more about someone's civillians than the army that is supposed to be protecting those same civillians.

I guess an alternative plan we could aim for to try to save some women and children would be to pay the Egyptians off to host some refugees, and if possible to try to enforce a temporary ceasefire long enough to let women and children flee Gaza. Even that may not be an effective plan though seeing as Hamas has forced civillians to stay in danger zones as human shields.
 

Atwood

Senior Member
May 1, 2014
4,995
53
48
What do you mean they lied? Did they blame it on a you tube video that degraded Mohammad (can I say that name) and it was a spontaneous uprising with the only difference being that they actually protected their people?
Was that not a great example of how stupid the media is?

And right now what I have been hearing NPR is more anti-Israel garbage.

IMHO, there is no solution to the Gaza problem aside from pushing the Moslems there into Egypt or shipping them to Jordan, actually a rather short movement of a few miles either way.

The story on NPR was going on & on about how Israel has the Gazans boxed into Gaza & won't let them freely cross the border. So Israel is at fault for not letting them invade Israel & kill Israelis?
 

Atwood

Senior Member
May 1, 2014
4,995
53
48
So again, who do we have to blow up for the USS Liberty incident? If the state of israel felt as strong about you do about the start of the war, why did they lie and tell the world that Egypt attacked them? You remember the saying, once a liar; makes you wonder what else they lied about to play a victim. *rubs chin*

But again, I don't overlook the deed of one over another base of a misguided belief.

As an aside, you comment still doesn't jibe with what I said. I didn't make any mention of reasons the state of israel had for attacking Egypt. I brought up the fact that they lied about it. But I guess that fact falls into the category of smoke and a giant load of manure, huh?

Jahsoul,
Tell me, do you believe in Allah?

Do you think the Jews should be allowed to have any state in the Land of Israel at all?
What would you do with those Jews? Exterminate them?