"If you continue to sin, you go to hell"

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
I

Imperfect

Guest
#81
Did God forgive King David for going into Bathsheba and for killing a man after David's repentance? Did God tell King David of his sin(s) through the prophet Nathan? Did God take away the consequences of that sin? Did King David repeat that sin(s)?

What you could have done is drink a beer and told them you didn't want anymore. Let them ask you why? Tell them you invited Christ in your life (give them your testimony, witness for Christ). It's obvious you are not ready. Dig yourself deeply in the word of God my friend, Get the word of God into you, equip yourself to give reason(s) for your faith, pray asking for wisdom and strength, and find a good bible/gospel believing/preaching church to help hold you accountable. Why do I say all this? because I've been there before bro, I let God down so many times. But now, I have a firm hold on Christ my God, and he has a delivered me and is still delivering me and will not let out of His hand.

Oh Abba Father, how GREAT thou art!
you lost me when you said its obvious im not ready. that, my friend is judging because you dont know me. i witness to pretty much everybody that knows me. everybody who knows me knows im a christian and take it seriously and stubborn in my faith and how i live. but thats what makes last night so shameful on my part. again, i didnt really have "sex", but i did penetrate very briefly, and received fellatio very briefly. i really wasnt in the mood for that for a few reasons. and my faith being the main reason.

and i wore 1 of my scripture printed shirts last night and explained it to her friend when she asked me about it. and i only had the 1 beer. her friend had more, she offered me some of hers, she had the strawberry flavored so i sipped that 1x to see how it tasted and it was much better than the lime, i must say so myself! ;)

but im not big on alcohol. its an occasional thing. and when i do, i do it responsibly and fully aware of my actions. like the whole 2013, i only drank maybe 3-4x, and of those times, id say 2x (including last night) i was a little intoxicated, not sloppy.

to say its obvious im not ready, and not know me, or how i use to live, or how i live now, or how i live now as opposed to how i use to live is very judgmental.
 
Aug 31, 2013
651
3
0
#82
Tannar,

So agape (G25) means rape.

What you are missing? Well, God is certainly not a rapist. You fool.

That's not what I said. Which word threw you? Should I use one syllable words?

Do you know what the Septuagint is?

DO you even read the post to understand it before you open your pie stained teeth chops?

You are babbling at this point.

Good bye.

Go learn what the Septuagint is. Look up the ONLY incestuous rape I know of in the Bible, and see what GREEK word they use there for it.

I am not saying it means rape. IT MEANT INCESTUOUS RAPE WHEN THEY USED IT.

THAT WAS 2200 years ago. I couldn't have "jacked with" the texts to fix it, I wasn't born yet.

What it should tell you is, that the word has a more complex meaning than your wiki guessed attempt at explaining it.

A wise man would want to understand it. I don't think I can say what the word is for the guy that ignores empirical facts that have 2200 years of history behind them and calls the person making him aware of those facts a fool.

The word is somethin glike by syllable here...

The opposite of EGO is >>>>>_______<<<<<<
Not you, not me, but >>>>>>________<<<<<<
When a game goes into over time it is in >>>>>>______<<<<<<

I took a page out of your passive aggressive indirect cut downs there. The difference is, at least I'm trying to make it fun.
 
C

cfultz3

Guest
#83
That's not what I said. Which word threw you? Should I use one syllable words?

Do you know what the Septuagint is?

DO you even read the post to understand it before you open your pie stained teeth chops?

You are babbling at this point.

Good bye.

Go learn what the Septuagint is. Look up the ONLY incestuous rape I know of in the Bible, and see what GREEK word they use there for it.

I am not saying it means rape. IT MEANT INCESTUOUS RAPE WHEN THEY USED IT.

THAT WAS 2200 years ago. I couldn't have "jacked with" the texts to fix it, I wasn't born yet.

What it should tell you is, that the word has a more complex meaning than your wiki guessed attempt at explaining it.

A wise man would want to understand it. I don't think I can say what the word is for the guy that ignores empirical facts that have 2200 years of history behind them and calls the person making him aware of those facts a fool.

The word is somethin glike by syllable here...

The opposite of EGO is >>>>>_______<<<<<<
Not you, not me, but >>>>>>________<<<<<<
When a game goes into over time it is in >>>>>>______<<<<<<

I took a page out of your passive aggressive indirect cut downs there. The difference is, at least I'm trying to make it fun.
You said that agape means rape. Scripture says that God is Agape.

Saying that agape means rape when it is said that God is agape is to be play around with "to make fun"? You are seriously wrong here.

2 Samuel 13 does not say that love is rape, it says that he loved her. It says that his hate for her was greater than his love.
 
Last edited:
Aug 31, 2013
651
3
0
#84
You said that agape means rape. Scripture says that God is Agape.
Go read what I said again, and quote it and show me where I said it.

Read slowly.

They don't offer us a crayola font.
I can only do so much.
 
C

cfultz3

Guest
#85
Go read what I said again, and quote it and show me where I said it.

Read slowly.

They don't offer us a crayola font.
I can only do so much.
I am not saying it means rape. IT MEANT INCESTUOUS RAPE WHEN THEY USED IT.
Tomato...tomatoe....rape is rape whether it is someone you know or someone you don't know.....
 
Aug 31, 2013
651
3
0
#86
Tomato...tomatoe....rape is rape whether it is someone you know or someone you don't know.....
No. good grief man. Do you need a window put where your navel is so you can see where you walk?

I didn't define agapao as rape.

Agapao as I defined it is established as emotion with an action attached.
It can be Rape, Charity, sex, and all sorts of others...

I'm telling you how a word is used historically, and you are telling me they were wrong when they used it 2200 years ago. Like some bozo (you or me) 2000+ years later would be able to correct them who used the word everyday.

This is beyond idiotic, I think you MUST be deliberately trying to provoke me as you can't make that obvious of a misread unintentionally. I"ll find the ignore user function, and not be tempted.
 
C

cfultz3

Guest
#88
No. good grief man. Do you need a window put where your navel is so you can see where you walk?

I didn't define agapao as rape.

Agapao as I defined it is established as emotion with an action attached.
It can be Rape, Charity, sex, and all sorts of others...

I'm telling you how a word is used historically, and you are telling me they were wrong when they used it 2200 years ago. Like some bozo (you or me) 2000+ years later would be able to correct them who used the word everyday.

This is beyond idiotic, I think you MUST be deliberately trying to provoke me as you can't make that obvious of a misread unintentionally. I"ll find the ignore user function, and not be tempted.
Show me is all I am asking. Show me Scripture where agape can mean rape and I will show you that agape is to love.
 
Aug 31, 2013
651
3
0
#89
Show me is all I am asking. Show me Scripture where agape can mean rape and I will show you that agape is to love.
Good gosh, I was asked to answer you.

I HAVE SHOWED YOU!!!!!! I PUT IT IN THE THREAD.

BUY THE SEPTUAGINT/ENGLISH INTERLINEAR. When you read in 2 Sam about incestuous Rape, Agape is the word used to name the action.

And I showed you another verse where a person AGAPE'd something that was against GOD not for God. So either one, renders your definition of the word........ useless. GOD IS NOT LOVING THE WORLD MORE THAN HIMSELF. And you'd have to prove that were true to hold your position. Back to ignore. We are done, more than done. You've misrepresented me, misquoted (errr lied nearly), denied to acknowledge things that were said more than once, selectively chosen what points I made you wished to address, rather than the whole comment as you do in decent conversations......

I can see NO REASON to continue to attempt an exegetical conversation with you. It's clear to me you are hell bent on trying NOT to have to change your mind on something. Dude, it's like sheets, ripping it out and changing it now and then isn't so bad.
 
J

jahsoul

Guest
#90
@Tannar


I'm didn't feel like edited HTML so I'm going to address each thing in each separate paragraph...lol


"Not enough to keep up" was a typo. It was supposed to say "not enough to keep you." But I think you are missing fundamental principles to your argument.


James said that faith without works is dead. Show me your faith without works and I'll show you my faith through my works. Maturation does come through work but our works is a reflect of our maturation. But how can we grow in faith?


1 Col. 14:20 - be mature through understanding
James 1 - testing of faith produces patiences, and letting patience have its perfect make, makes us perfect and complete. Also sin is birth through temptation when we are draw by our own desires and are entice.
1 Peter 2:2 - desiring the pure milk of the word causes us to grow


Also, where is the Holy Spirit in the analogy? Thankfully for us, we have that advantage.


I am looking at what backwards? Benefits from the journey before the journey? So continual sin is milestones on a roadmap? I'm really trying to understand. What is the issue (and where is it in the Bible) that say I must sin in order to grow? Where does it say that falling after I accept Christ is a prerequisite for maturity? 1 Peter 2 tells us that Christ is our example and he was without sin. So you are telling me that I'm supposed to ignore the example of Christ for the sake of a "journey" or "process?"


I knew this element of Grace was going to come up but Paul asked the question, "Shall we continue to sin that grace may abound?" First, the foundation of God's grace is while we were yet sinners, Christ came down to die for OUR sins that we might be reconciled to God. That being said, people use grace as a free bucket of get out of jail free cards when they decide to sin. While it is there because we have an advocate before the Father, lets look at what Paul said. Also, after I give my life to Christ, what benefit does sin bring to my life?


I'm lost on how you are reading Romans 6:22. First, karpón doesn't really mean benefit. It literally means fruit, also the base of this word is used when Jesus states that will will know a tree by its fruit and karpón is the exact word used in John 15 when Jesus sas that whoever abides in him bears much fruit; "for without Me, you can do nothing." karpoón is used by Jesus in Matthew 7, when He say by their fruits we shall know them. That being said,




I'm not giving myself credit for anything but I also understand that we just don't come to Christ and sit still. We just don't accept the Lord and then never read or pray. Again, this goes back to the Armor of God. Ephesians 6:13 tells us to put on the whole armour (some KJV for ya ;-) ) of God so we can stand. Show me in Bible where it say we come to Christ and do nothing. Regarding 1 Cor. 8, reread it for context. What he is saying is don't ever thing we are so high that we forget that loves is what build and grows. For those who have not come to the full knowledge of Christ and don't understand true liberty in Christ, certain things that we know is not sin may confuse those who don't know yet. We should not let our knowledge be a roadblock to those who aren't mature. We should not use our knowledge to put down one that is weak but love to build them up. Yes, works doesn't build but love does. Nothing is wrong with having to much scripture in our heart. Where did you get that from?


Actually, the pennacle of our spiritual maturity is being like Christ, which if you look at, totally emcompass the fruit of the Spirit.


I totally understand that Paul was speaking in generalities. He used we....lol.


Note taken on the Holy Spirit, but if that's the case, where was it when the pitcher needed to become a lefty?
 
C

cfultz3

Guest
#91
Good gosh, I was asked to answer you. (tell those who are in secret that I say thanks for convincing you to answer me.)

I HAVE SHOWED YOU!!!!!! I PUT IT IN THE THREAD. (and my request here was posted before than)

BUY THE SEPTUAGINT/ENGLISH INTERLINEAR. When you read in 2 Sam about incestuous Rape, Agape is the word used to name the action. (And "abase"? Was this not shown to you and those who speak to you that "abase" is used in that chapter, by comparison of other verses using that word, to mean "consensual or forced sex". It is far fetched to say that "agape" can mean rape, when it is said that God is (to be, exist) agape.)

And I showed you another verse where a person AGAPE'd something that was against GOD not for God (and it seems that Demas esteemed the world more than following Paul and by that esteem, he deemed it more adventurous to leave God behind for his pursuits in the world). So either one, renders your definition of the word........ useless (agape = love of esteem. Seems they both esteemed something and acted upon that esteem). GOD IS NOT LOVING THE WORLD MORE THAN HIMSELF. And you'd have to prove that were true to hold your position (But, God did esteem the world by sending His Son. God does esteem the Son. God does esteem us. But, notice it was not said in the comparison, but in the absolute). Back to ignore. We are done, more than done. You've misrepresented me, misquoted (errr lied nearly), denied to acknowledge things that were said more than once (and yet, I have answered them all), selectively chosen what points I made you wished to address, rather than the whole comment as you do in decent conversations (like I am doing here?)......

I can see NO REASON to continue to attempt an exegetical conversation with you (to interpret agape as rape is non-debatable, while it was shown that "abase" was the word used for "rape". I have looked and looked in the Bible, online and even asked others, no one is able to show me where "agape" can mean rape. But, it all instances, it was shown that it means love. What if there is a possibility that agape can be defined as rape. Then show me where we can insert that meaning in any verse?). It's clear to me you are hell bent (Satan is not is my purpose) on trying NOT to have to change your mind on something (simple because agape does not, never has been used for rape). Dude, it's like sheets, ripping it out and changing it now and then isn't so bad (love should never be equate as rape. Should we change the meaning of Son to something like "devil", seeing that it is not so bad?).
............
 
Aug 31, 2013
651
3
0
#92
But I think you are missing fundamental principles to your argument.
Obviously I don't think so, but I'll listen, I won't know until I consider them, right?

James said that faith without works is dead. Show me your faith without works and I'll show you my faith through my works. Maturation does come through work but our works is a reflect of our maturation. But how can we grow in faith?
You grow in faith, by doing the works. Look the goal according to 1 john 4:16-18 is to learn to love like God does. If you don't have the love right, he's not in you and you aren't in Him. Jesus showed what is right love in Matt 5:43-48. Love like HE DOES a PROVIDENTIAL LOVE, not a standoffish love.

You can't learn to love right, without doing the works. When you first try to do them, you'll screw up. He helps coach you to the right way. As you screw up, you run the race, you learn, and He gets you there. Nothing in james disagrees with Ephesians 4. If it did, then you prove the Bible is unreliable. It all fits in just fine...

Like the pitcher analogy I've used.

Saved= invited to God's baseball team.
He says you gotta move from righty, to lefty, both pitching and batting.
You wont' get it down, until you go and throw the ball and swing the bat.
I>E> you won't learn to love, until you get out and love.

That word Agapao requires the demonstration, as Paul exemplifies in Gal 5:6

1 Col. 14:20 - be mature through understanding
Eph four agrees, you get understanding through works. And through the works you get maturity.

I have to ask, have you even read and broke down the eph 4 passage yet? Or are you just assuming you are right and I'm wrong. Cause some of these were pretty obvious.


James 1 - testing of faith produces patiences, and letting patience have its perfect make, makes us perfect and complete. Also sin is birth through temptation when we are draw by our own desires and are entice.
1 Peter 2:2 - desiring the pure milk of the word causes us to grow
Not sure what you mean by the James 1 verse. James is in total agreement with me.

The peter verse.... I'm going to ask you, why do you refuse the meat of Eph 4 and keep trying to stuff it in a milk bottle.

For the record I never denigrate to people on the milk meat issue, as it is possible I'm the one that's wrong, but you dropped that hammer first, I merely return it to you to demonstrate how unhelpful it is.

Also, where is the Holy Spirit in the analogy? Thankfully for us, we have that advantage.
ah ohh, which analogy was it??? In the baseball analogy, He'd be the coach, or the desire in you as you try to master the new issue.

I am looking at what backwards? Benefits from the journey before the journey? So continual sin is milestones on a road map? I'm really trying to understand. What is the issue (and where is it in the Bible) that say I must sin in order to grow?
You don't set out to not sin, think you achieve it, and then proclaim to be a mature believer. that's not how scripture shows it.

You learn to love, this is Maturity. You learn to love through works, and your understanding matures through experience from the works. AFTER you get the love right, OR rather, are led to that point by God's coaching, then the result is, you do not sin. THIS is how you know someone loves God. If you abide in love, God abides in you and you in Him. Until you have the love, you won't keep the commandments. You may work at it really hard, and be really successful sometimes.... but until the love is right, the obedience still struggles along.

Where does it say that falling after I accept Christ is a prerequisite for maturity?
This is called a strawman. You can learn about that at wikipedia, or dictionary.com.

1 Peter 2 tells us that Christ is our example and he was without sin. So you are telling me that I'm supposed to ignore the example of Christ for the sake of a "journey" or "process?"
why don't you deal with what I did say, rather than try to paint I said something I didn't? We'll get along better, I promise.

I'm telling you that maturity develops, it's not an altar call and POOF YOU GOT IT! And as it develops, you may screw up. Thus 1 john 1:9. Through the screw ups, you are taught, guided, directed by God. But, you are focused on sin. That's a satanic red herring. :) The focus is on love. Not sin. There is no fear in love, as fear is a fear of punishment. A punishment for your sins causes the fear. You wreak of fear here. You are ONLY looking at your fear. But, the lesson here, is if you have learned the love, you don't fear the punishment. Your chosen path runs from fear, not to love. It's doomed to fail until it's changed.
IOW perhaps this is just part of your journey.

I knew this element of Grace was going to come up but Paul asked the question, "Shall we continue to sin that grace may abound?" First, the foundation of God's grace is while we were yet sinners, Christ came down to die for OUR sins that we might be reconciled to God. That being said, people use grace as a free bucket of get out of jail free cards when they decide to sin. While it is there because we have an advocate before the Father, lets look at what Paul said. Also, after I give my life to Christ, what benefit does sin bring to my life?
This paragraph has nothing to do with anything I've said. NOR with the topic. It's a fractal drop of information.

I'm lost on how you are reading Romans 6:22. First, karpón doesn't really mean benefit. It literally means fruit, also the base of this word is used when Jesus states that will will know a tree by its fruit and karpón is the exact word used in John 15 when Jesus sas that whoever abides in him bears much fruit; "for without Me, you can do nothing." karpoón is used by Jesus in Matthew 7, when He say by their fruits we shall know them. That being said,
Tell me does "benefit" or "fruit" change anything? Or are you just trying to demonstrate you can use a Strongs concordance?
So, what are you asking about Rom 6:22. I think I explained it out in detail when I posted it, although perhaps that was in another thread, but I think it was here.... I have to tell you, in four different conversations, I'm at a point where people are just repeating the same words over and over, and ignoring answers already given more than once. I don't think I can explain how disrespectful that is, and how it shows you find opposition to your thoughts insignificant and not even worth considering. Why not just buy a dang soapbox and plant it on a corner and tell the whole world what you want them to believe and be done with it?

ROm 6:22 shows freed from sins, atonement frees you from sins. After that you go into the obedience stage, or slave to God. From that struggle you gain a benefit. And the benefit, not the obedience is what leads you to maturity/sanctification.

Don't tell me I'm wrong if you can't show me where and how. You have not earned the right to just deny what i've said without an answer.


I'm not giving myself credit for anything but I also understand that we just don't come to Christ and sit still. We just don't accept the Lord and then never read or pray. Again, this goes back to the Armor of God.
So, let's do it your way. You go sit in the closet and read and pray. You come up with some idea of what it means. No one else in the world agrees (in this example), but you swear you got the Spirit of GOD teaching you. So the world is wrong and you are right. So what happens? Historically you go make your own church/denomination.

Eph 4 says that through works, led by the leaders of the CHURCH you get UNITY and KNOWLEDGE OF CHRIST.

Look, you've yet to address the ephesians 4 explanations. Until you do, I'm just repeating myself.

Ephesians 6:13 tells us to put on the whole armour (some KJV for ya ;-) ) of God so we can stand.
Ephesians 4 shows that you are led by the church to build your armor. So what's your point? Rather than let the people trained to make the armor do their job, you are piecing your own armor together. I get the picture of....
captainamerica11.jpg



Show me in Bible where it say we come to Christ and do nothing.
I don't think I can. I've never said it. I don't think anyone else has said it either. Are you arguing with your imagination and ignoring what I say?


Regarding 1 Cor. 8, reread it for context. What he is saying is don't ever thing we are so high that we forget that loves is what build and grows. For those who have not come to the full knowledge of Christ and don't understand true liberty in Christ, certain things that we know is not sin may confuse those who don't know yet. We should not let our knowledge be a roadblock to those who aren't mature. We should not use our knowledge to put down one that is weak but love to build them up. Yes, works doesn't build but love does. Nothing is wrong with having to much scripture in our heart. Where did you get that from?
You can't LOVE without works. AGAPAO without the works, is phileo. With out the acting on the love, it's a dream and warm fuzzies. Only through doing those gal 5:6 works will you get to maturity.

You just proved my point in your last paragraph, and you don't even know it. Which isn't unusual since most of your arguments aren't what I spoke of.

Actually, the pennacle of our spiritual maturity is being like Christ, which if you look at, totally encompass the fruit of the Spirit.
Open your eyes, stop closing them and drawing your own pictures. GO READ EPHESIANS FOUR PLEASE. The fruit of the spirit is the benefit of having the Spirit. NOT ACTS YOU PERFORM TO SUMMON THE SPIRIT. You either have it or you don't. If you have it, the fruit is demonstrated in your life/actions.

Note taken on the Holy Spirit, but if that's the case, where was it when the pitcher needed to become a lefty?
He was the catcher, seeing what was wrong and guiding the pitcher to get better.
 
L

letti

Guest
#93
TannarDarr,thank you
 
Aug 31, 2013
651
3
0
#94
I think the one that said to come back is annoyed with both of us. I'm going to take you off ignore temporarily to reconcile this.

I'm sitting on Logos bible scholar software. It's 1400 bucks worth. The word in the Septuagint is agapao for the place that concerns my argument.

https://bible.org/seriespage/tragedy-royal-family-2-samuel-131-36#P1349_544105

See foot note 63 as well. Bible.org is a pretty conservative place. I mean real conservative. I don't where you see some Greek word that is abase. I'm not familiar with a greek word Abase.

Here is another one fro ma KJV ONLY group.
"Love" or "Agape love" in John 21:15 et al.? - King James Version Today

Go back and read the other verse I gave you where the man.... oh never mind. I'm done. It's very disrespectful for you to sit there and make a public spectacle of me being wrong, when you dont' even answer things I gave you at the first of the conversation. You may rant on. We are done.
 
J

jahsoul

Guest
#95
@Tannar

I'm trying to figure out where this alter call keep coming from?? lol. Also, I actually don't use the Strongs as much as I'll like to. I usually use a Greek-to-English while reading the Interlinear Bible. But I'm going to hit on certain points that you brought out, starting with Ephesians 4.


Now I'm trying to understand our disconnect. I know Ephesians 4 pretty well and I've only seen you bring up to others and not me unless I missed something but I will address it. I see you focused on the section regarding spiritual gifts. It says that God has appointed people to be different things in the body of Christ (not all of those positions are church leaders, but some are) to equip saints to the the work of the ministry, to build up the Body of Christ. How are we equipped and what are we equipped with? We get our instruction from the Word of God. So we are equipped with instruction from the Word and then we go do. Read 2 Timothy 3:16-17 regarding this.


Romans 6:22 - We have been set free from sin, and because we are free from sin we are slaves to God (as stated in verse 18). The result/outcome (fruit) of being slaves to God is purification (holiness) with the finished result being eternal life.


On that note, I will have to finish this up tomorrow. About to get ready to eat but I will address the other parts tomorrow. Be blessed.
 
C

cfultz3

Guest
#96
I think the one that said to come back is annoyed with both of us.
If the one who said to come back is annoyed with me and I do not know who this person is, should I be concerned? I am beginning to feel that I need to be concerned about this person coercing you to come back and talk to me. Is he behind the scene pulling strings?
 
C

cfultz3

Guest
#97
I think the one that said to come back is annoyed with both of us. I'm going to take you off ignore temporarily to reconcile this.

I'm sitting on Logos bible scholar software. It's 1400 bucks worth. The word in the Septuagint is agapao for the place that concerns my argument.

https://bible.org/seriespage/tragedy-royal-family-2-samuel-131-36#P1349_544105

See foot note 63 as well. Bible.org is a pretty conservative place. I mean real conservative. I don't where you see some Greek word that is abase. I'm not familiar with a greek word Abase.

Here is another one fro ma KJV ONLY group.
"Love" or "Agape love" in John 21:15 et al.? - King James Version Today

Go back and read the other verse I gave you where the man.... oh never mind. I'm done. It's very disrespectful for you to sit there and make a public spectacle of me being wrong, when you dont' even answer things I gave you at the first of the conversation. You may rant on. We are done.
I am setting on the internet where I can get everything free. That is like saying I spend $1400 so that means everything they say is right. Hardly true.

G5013 is there. I saw it about 4-5 times in that chapter.
 
C

cfultz3

Guest
#98
If the one who said to come back is annoyed with me and I do not know who this person is, should I be concerned? I am beginning to feel that I need to be concerned about this person coercing you to come back and talk to me. Is he behind the scene pulling strings?
I would like to know who this person/people is, seeing you are causing a spirit of alertness.
 
C

cfultz3

Guest
#99
https://bible.org/seriespage/tragedy-royal-family-2-samuel-131-36#P1349_544105

See foot note 63 as well. Bible.org is a pretty conservative place. I mean real conservative.
63 This is probably a good place to make an observation. Four times in our text the word “love” is used. It is clear that the “love” of Amnon is little more than lust, and yet these four times the translators of the Septuagint, the Greek translation of the Old Testament, used the Greek word agapao. Let those who would suggest or state that “agape love” is a divine love, the highest form of love, take note that this is not consistent with the use of the word, either in the Septuagint or in the New Testament. Let us beware of over-simplification
I again assert that he acted upon his esteem of his sister and by which, he abased her. Agape = love of esteem. God and man can feel this and all involved can and do act upon that. But, because we can act upon that does not mean that it becomes the act we performed by it. Example: I esteem my parents and because I do, I do things for them. But that act is not agape itself, but was performed in that agape.
 
C

cfultz3

Guest
Although it is doubtless true that the entire range of αγαπάω (agapao, to love) and the entire range of φιλέω (phileo, to love) are not exactly the same, nevertheless they enjoy substantial overlap; and where they overlap, appeal to a "root meaning" in order to discern a difference is fallacious. In 2 Samuel 13 (LXX), both αγαπάω (agapao, to love) and the cognate ἀγάπη (agape, love) can refer to Amnon's incestuous rape of his half sister Tamar (2 Sam. 13:15, LXX). (Exegetical Fallacies, p. 31)
Again, he agaped his sister and by that agape, he raped her. To say that it is fallacious to discern the difference between agape and phileo is to say that Jesus was fallacious in making that distinction with Peter. We all know this is not true of Jesus, our very God.