SeaBass has a habit of posting words like "so" and "therefore" when he has presented no cogent inference. To say that because something is commanded it is essential to salvation, is nonsense.
and had to do with Cornelius salvation in remitting his sins per Acts 2:38
Cornelius is not in Acts 2. And neither is water in Acts 2:38. "in remitting" does not occur in Acts 2:38.
Moreover, Cornelius is not an example of unbaptized Believers. Moreover, there are no unbaptized believers discussed in Acts 2.
Cornelius could not be saved until he "worked righteousness" Acts 10:35.
Act 10 does not say that. And it is contrary to scripture; salvation is not of works.
Cornelius submitting to God's command to be water baptized is working righteousness.
Another unproven statement by SeaBass.
An unbaptized believer threfore is one who has NOT worked righteousness but is working unrighteousness by rejecting the gospel message, Acts 2:41,44.
Again SeaBass uses the words SO & THEREFORE, where he makes no cogent inference. What Cornelius did is not an example of an unbaptized believer. Acts 2:41, 44 does not prove anything you posted. That is just you, Seabass.