Where I had written "bear in mind that vv.6-7,1 provides the same time period that 7:25 also had spoken of...," I was NOT speaking of Matt24, but of Daniel 12 [Daniel 12:6-7,1] (the chpt that "lamad" suggests corresponds with Antiochus Epiphanes [in past history], and not the future trib years--of which idea I DISAGREE)
When it comes to MATTHEW 24:6-8, yes[!], that is indeed IN / DURING / WITHIN the "future" TRIB yrs, in the FIRST HALF[!]... so you and I are in agreement here.
My apologies for being unclear (since I had opted for a sparsely-worded explanation... my theory held true... it was unclear to the reader, namely *you* this time, due to not enough explanatory text ... I'm taking note, and will go back to my more-detailed explanations, so as to make unmistakable, my intentions. Thank you for bringing that to my attention, yet again!!! )
When it comes to MATTHEW 24:6-8, yes[!], that is indeed IN / DURING / WITHIN the "future" TRIB yrs, in the FIRST HALF[!]... so you and I are in agreement here.
My apologies for being unclear (since I had opted for a sparsely-worded explanation... my theory held true... it was unclear to the reader, namely *you* this time, due to not enough explanatory text ... I'm taking note, and will go back to my more-detailed explanations, so as to make unmistakable, my intentions. Thank you for bringing that to my attention, yet again!!! )
I was NOT speaking of Matt24, but of Daniel 12 [Daniel 12:6-7,1] (the chpt that "lamad" suggests corresponds with Antiochus Epiphanes [in past history], and not the future trib years--of which idea I DISAGREE)