E
I am trying to get you to see some of the stuff you post does not make sense. and is just quite out there, especially when you say stuff like Jesus (who is God and also well versed in OT scripture) could have known Jerusalem was going to be destroyed. I mean really??
See, Eternallygrateful, you are either messing with me and everyone reading this or you really havent a clue what you are saying from one post to the next.
Here is what I actually said:
I didnt ask about Christ prophesying (and yes Jesus is a Prophet) the destruction of Jerusalem.
I asked when did God prophesy that they would not come to the truth as you assert here:
You make it seem as God did not know and they could somehow fool him and come to truth when he prophesied they would not
I asked when did God prophesy that they would not come to the truth as you assert here:
You make it seem as God did not know and they could somehow fool him and come to truth when he prophesied they would not
So if you get around to it, please address where it says this:
You make it seem as God did not know and they could somehow fool him and come to truth when he prophesied they would not
And I did not say Jesus needed to prophesy, I said he knew. How did he know? Ot prophesy.
You make it seem as God did not know and they could somehow fool him and come to truth when he prophesied they would not
So show me where in OT prophesy it says israel could not come to truth.
Please dont forget to post those prophesies again.
Daniel was told the city and sanctuary (jerusalem) would be destroyed and trampled after messiah was cut off. Did you forget this passage? there are also other passages which show this.. are you still going to deny it?
Jesus was cut off....then within a generation (40 years) Titus came and they trampled the city.
Why would I deny what I have been saying all along.
But I have seen this before. People slowly (or with a start) come out of your system then are too proud to say so they try a smokescreen.
Either that or you just cant remember the flow of dialogue.
Who knows.
2. No "father" of the nation of Isreal walked or lived in the new jerusalem. OT prophesy states God will bring them back to the land their fathers walked on, Lived in, and loved, The land they were promised. The can not be the new jerusalem. so no I will not concede a doctrine which is not true, and not scripturally supported without twisting the word of God.
I wonder if you have the guts to actually read what this says:
Hebrews 11
The Triumphs of Faith
1Now faith is the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen. 2For by it the men of old gained approval.
3By faith we understand that the worlds were prepared by the word of God, so that what is seen was not made out of things which are visible. 4By faith Abel offered to God a better sacrifice than Cain, through which he obtained the testimony that he was righteous, God testifying about his gifts, and through faith, though he is dead, he still speaks. 5By faith Enoch was taken up so that he would not see death; AND HE WAS NOT FOUND BECAUSE GOD TOOK HIM UP; for he obtained the witness that before his being taken up he was pleasing to God. 6And without faith it is impossible to please Him, for he who comes to God must believe that He is and that He is a rewarder of those who seek Him. 7By faith Noah, being warned by God about things not yet seen, in reverence prepared an ark for the salvation of his household, by which he condemned the world, and became an heir of the righteousness which is according to faith.
8By faith Abraham, when he was called, obeyed by going out to a place which he was to receive for an inheritance; and he went out, not knowing where he was going. 9By faith he lived as an alien in the land of promise, as in a foreign land, dwelling in tents with Isaac and Jacob, fellow heirs of the same promise; 10for he was looking for the city which has foundations, whose architect and builder is God. 11By faith even Sarah herself received ability to conceive, even beyond the proper time of life, since she considered Him faithful who had promised. 12Therefore there was born even of one man, and him as good as dead at that, as many descendants AS THE STARS OF HEAVEN IN NUMBER, AND INNUMERABLE AS THE SAND WHICH IS BY THE SEASHORE.
13All these died in faith, without receiving the promises, but having seen them and having welcomed them from a distance, and having confessed that they were strangers and exiles on the earth. 14For those who say such things make it clear that they are seeking a country of their own. 15And indeed if they had been thinking of that country from which they went out, they would have had opportunity to return. 16But as it is, they desire a better country, that is, a heavenly one. Therefore God is not ashamed to be called their God; for He has prepared a city for them.
I did not insert a 1000 year time, God did by telling us he would rule for 1000 years. your argument is with God not me.
God has nothing to do with what you teach.
yeah, I guess being shown you are in error is does not feel good. So I can see your frustration. I used to get frustrated also, and hide it or try to run from it so I did not have to admit I made an error.
The question was did Jesus know Jerusalem would be destroyed or not? and "all Isreal rejecting Christ" where do you get this?
You said:
You make it seem as God did not know and they could somehow fool him and come to truth when he prophesied they would not [/QUOTE]
the church would be anyone from adam and eve until the last person alive on earth who accepted Gods provision for salvation. However it was not called the church until some time in NT times. I more like the term the body of Christ, or God adopted sons and daughters. or those who are saved by Gods love
Does that include all the first christians (who were israelites) and all the israelites who have become christians for the last 2000 years...oh. right. In your world there are none of those.
The church will be here on earth until the end.