Do you think Enoch had no sin?
Wasn't he born of flesh?
Nt and ot is same doctrine, nt can explain ot, vice verser.
Why in ot they sacrifice lamb and ox?
“Do you think Enoch had no sin?”
i didn’t say either way what I said was there’s no indication on any way that I have ever seen that he or any Old Testament person needed to or would be “ born again “ because it’s an an entirely New Testament promise and concept .
“Wasn't he born of flesh?”
Yes every human being has a body of flesh …. And a living spirit . the body dies the spirit returns to god for judgement. This was true from Adam forward but still there’s absolutely no means or doctrine for any of them to be “ born again “ again , I’m open to that scripture or biblical doctrine but haven’t ever myself seen it
“Nt and ot is same doctrine,”
this is misunderstood they aren’t the same doctrine one foretells the other and the latter fulfills those prophetic points within the first
the doctrine is contrary
Eye for an eye v turn the other cheek
Freely divorce and remarry if you’re not happy v there’s no reason to divorce and remarry but for adultery. Shew no mercy no pity for the offender v be merciful , forgive , don’t retaliate evil for evil or wound for wound or stripe for stripe …. Contrary doctrine with different ordinations and mediators same God two covenants
But again I’m always open to actual biblical statements in scripture .
In the ot they weren’t baptized into Christ they were baptized into Moses . Under a different covenant . Surely Moses spoke and wrote of Christ many figures like the brazen serpent but the brazen serpent was under the old covenant and
when they looked upon it the thing moses had made they lived when they should have died being bitten
This didn’t include them in Christ or atone for thoer sins like jesus death it just was for the time them present a figure , found in thier first covenant of the second to come later
One was made with israel specifically and was broken and became the curse it warned of. The other was promised to them after this happened after they had broken it and lost hope he gave them promises of a new covenant
not according to the old which they broke
there are many things in the law to witness of Christ to come later but thier cofenant eas very effective at the time it was present and meant the things it said
Like the day of atonement . It’s not as if the things they performed didn’t work , it was thier behavior of sin and rebellion that causes the defilement and made it ineffective. They had a complete covenant with a mediator a high priest a preisthood a sanctuary a chosen people ect ect
there’s a new one now. The new is where one can be and needs to be born again. I’ve never read a sentance about being born again in the old
bit that doesn’t mean it’s not there my friend or that I’m not wrong about it.
just my opinion based on what I’ve read in scripture nothing more