My last post was really not intended with as much "harshness" as you are making it sound...
~
I actually understand the globe earth physics that describe how this eclipse could happen the way it is predicted -- "if, and only if, all of the angles are just right"...
And, it does seem to line up with the current data. ( Of course, it always will - it is designed that way. )
But, it is actually a requirement ( for it to work as predicted ) that the spin of the earth has to be moving faster than the moon's orbital speed.
If posthuman actually meant something different, then he should have said something different. What he actually stated means that the moon would go around the earth in less than 24 hours.
When you talk about "orbital speed", you are actually talking about angular change over time. ( Hence, from the word 'orbital'. ) If the moon were orbiting the earth faster than the earth was spinning, then that would mean that one 'orbit' of the moon would overtake one 'revolution' of the earth in less than 24 hours.
He was probably trying to compare how the moon would track across the "field of view" between the sun and the earth ( as would be seen from the earth - but, from the sun-side perspective ) to how the U.S.A. would track through that "field" in a spinning motion during that segment of time. Maybe. But, that is not what he actually said.
So --- I am [ mostly ] just messin' with him...
Try not to worry about it. Hopefully, he won't either...
~
I actually understand the globe earth physics that describe how this eclipse could happen the way it is predicted -- "if, and only if, all of the angles are just right"...
And, it does seem to line up with the current data. ( Of course, it always will - it is designed that way. )
But, it is actually a requirement ( for it to work as predicted ) that the spin of the earth has to be moving faster than the moon's orbital speed.
If posthuman actually meant something different, then he should have said something different. What he actually stated means that the moon would go around the earth in less than 24 hours.
When you talk about "orbital speed", you are actually talking about angular change over time. ( Hence, from the word 'orbital'. ) If the moon were orbiting the earth faster than the earth was spinning, then that would mean that one 'orbit' of the moon would overtake one 'revolution' of the earth in less than 24 hours.
He was probably trying to compare how the moon would track across the "field of view" between the sun and the earth ( as would be seen from the earth - but, from the sun-side perspective ) to how the U.S.A. would track through that "field" in a spinning motion during that segment of time. Maybe. But, that is not what he actually said.
So --- I am [ mostly ] just messin' with him...
Try not to worry about it. Hopefully, he won't either...
The angles are a factor on either sphere or flat in line with the Firmanent..
God moved the sun by 10 degrees... so nothing is Impossible...
If you look for anything then much about Salem and 33 degrees and it passing over the Georgia guidestones which look like some kind of sun dial... is wide spread... some are comparing to Nineveh...