Eternal Security You CANNOT lose your salvation! by David J. Stewart | January 2004

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Dec 21, 2012
2,901
39
0
No one can lose their salvation for where is the glory of Jesus Christ as our Savior in that? How can we go around telling the Good News that Christ has saved us if it is still in the maybes?

Our message is not " Have you heard the POSSIBLE Good News to man? Jesus Christ MIGHT HAVE saved us. We do not know for sure, but He MIGHT HAVE." and smile so brightly, blinking like a happy little lamb? For what? In vain?

No. If we are not saved yet... then we are false witnesses of God for saying that Jesus Christ IS the Savior, BUT BECAUSE He is the Savior, then that can only mean we are saved.

The problem here is that believers mix up verses for discipleship as if mortifying the deeds of the body by the Spirit and running the race by faith in Jesus Christ as our author & finisher of our faith in laying aside every weight & sin is for salvation. It is not for salvation. It is for discipleship to be received as a vessel unto honor with crowns at the pre trib rapture event to AVOID being a castaway to face the coming fire on the earth and the coming great tribulation as a vessel unto dishonor in His House.
 
Apr 30, 2016
5,162
75
0
once enlightened - The word enlightened means to bring to light, to shed light upon or to cause light to shine upon some object, in the sense of illuminating it. Figuratively, photizo means to give guidance or understanding, to make clear or to cause something to be known by revealing clearly. John 1:9 describes Jesus, the "true Light," giving light "to every man"; but this cannot mean the light of salvation, because not every man is saved. This light either leads to the complete acceptance of Jesus Christ or produces condemnation in those who reject such light.

partakers of the Holy Spirit - Partakers describes one who shares with someone else as an associate in an enterprise or undertaking. It speaks of those who are participators in something. Business partner, companion. Participating in. Accomplice in. Comrade. Metochos is used elsewhere in Hebrews in the context of believers (Hebrews 3:14 - "For we have become partakers of Christ") and thus the statement that the readers have been made partakers of the Holy Spirit seems at first glance to be support that true believers are being addressed, yet there are other ministries of the Holy Spirit that precede the indwelling of believers. It is very plausible to envision an individual becoming a sharer in or partaker of the Spirit (and his pre-salvation ministry - convicting of sin, righteousness and judgment to come) by responding for a time to His drawing power intended to lead sinners to Christ. The translation "shared" implies something done in company with others and before salvation all believers shared in the convicting ministry of the Spirit Who drew them to salvation. Note also that the writer does not state that these individuals were "indwelt by the Holy Spirit" or "sealed by the Holy Spirit" or "possessors of the Spirit's pledge (guarantee) of future inheritance."

tasted the good word of God - They had tasted in such a way as to give them a distinct impression of its character and quality, yet they still turned away. Inherent in the idea of tasting is the fact that one might or might not decide to accept the thing that is tasted. For example, the same Greek word (geuomai) is used in Matthew 27:34 to say that those crucifying Jesus "offered him wine to drink, mingled with gall; but when he tasted it, he would not drink it." Do we taste into one Spirit or drink into one Spirit? (1 Corinthians 12:13).

fall away - I find it interesting that the term "fall away" or "stumble" was used by the Lord Jesus of His 11 disciples at the time of His arrest. The disciples deserted Jesus as was predicted and Peter obviously denied Jesus three times. They were said to "fall away." Matthew 26:31 - Then Jesus said to them, "You will all fall away because of Me this night, for it is written, 'I WILL STRIKE DOWN THE SHEPHERD, AND THE SHEEP OF THE FLOCK SHALL BE SCATTERED.' 32 "But after I have been raised, I will go ahead of you to Galilee." 33 But Peter said to Him, "Even though all may fall away because of You, I will never fall away." Obviously, this was not a loss of salvation. For a righteous man may fall seven times AND rise again, But the wicked shall FALL by calamity. (Proverbs 24:16)

Hebrews 6:7,8 - For the earth which drinks in the rain that often comes upon it, and bears herbs useful for those by whom it is cultivated, receives blessing from God; but if it bears thorns and briars, it is rejected and near to being cursed, whose end is to be burned. In this agricultural metaphor, those who receive final judgment are compared to land that bears no vegetation or useful fruit, but rather bears thorns and thistles. When we recall the other metaphors in Scripture where good fruit is a sign of true spiritual life and fruitfulness is a sign of false believers (for example - Matthew 3:8-10; 7:15-20; 12:33-35), we already have an indication that the author is speaking of people whose most trustworthy evidence of their spiritual condition (the fruit they bear) is negative, suggesting that the author is talking about people who are not genuine Christians.

Verse 9 sums it up for me.
The writer is speaking to those truly saved (calls them BELOVED). He says that even though he speaks like this concerning THOSE types of people, He is convinced of better things concerning YOU. Things that ACCOMPANY SALVATION. Thorns and briars and permanently falling away do not accompany salvation.

It is generally stated by those who believe salvation can be lost that you can get it back again. If the writer of Hebrews was truly teaching that a really "saved," person really "lost their salvation" then why didn't he simply say, "For it is impossible for those who were once born again or saved, if they fall away, to renew them again to salvation? Why is it that we never find the words "lost or lose your salvation" in the Bible? *That would certainly settle the issue.
Hi Mailmandan,

I find it totally incredible that the OSAS crowd has to twist and turn and change scrpture and words to mean what THEY want it to mean.

You gave the correct meaning to each of the above phrases, but then, in usual manner, you twisted the meaning around to make it mean what suits you.

This is from a bible encyclopedia:

Encyclopedias - International Standard Bible Encyclopedia - Enlighten
ENLIGHTEN
en-lit'-'-n:

(1) 'or, "illumination" in every sense, used in the ordinary sense of giving natural light (Psalms 97:4 the King James Version; see also Ezra 9:8) or as a sign of health and vigor (1 Samuel 14:27,29). "His eyes were enlightened," literally, "became bright." He had become weary and faint with the day's exertions and anxieties, and now recovers (see Job 33:30 and compare Psalms 13:3). Thus in sickness and grief, the eyes are dull and heavy; dying eyes are glazed; but health and joy render them bright and sparkling, as with a light from within.

(2) In Psalms 18:28 the King James Version, The word naghah, figuratively describes the believer's deliverance from the gloom of adversity and the restoration of joy in the knowledge of God.

(3) Most frequently the terms so translated mean the giving of spiritual light to the soul (Psalms 19:8; Ephesians 1:18, photizo; Hebrews 6:4; 10:32). This spiritual enlightening the Spirit of God brings about through the Divine word (Psalms 119:130; 2 Timothy 3:15; 2 Peter 1:19). Sin mars the intellectual discernment; "but he that is spiritual discerneth all things" (1 Corinthians 2:15 King James Version, margin).

M. O. Evans

VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV

KJV Dictionary Definition: partake


PARTAKE, v.i. pret. partook; pp. partaken. part and take.

1. To take a part, portion or share in common with others; to have a share or part; to participate; usually followed by of, sometimes less properly by in. All men partake of the common bounties of Providence. Clodius was at the feast,but could not partake of the enjoyments.

2. To have something of the property, nature, claim or right.

The attorney of the duchy of Lancaster partakes partly of a judge, and partly of an attorney general.

3. To be admitted; not to be excluded.

PARTA'KE, v.t. To have a part in; to share.

My royal father lives;

Let every one partake the general joy.

This is probably elliptical, of being omitted.

1. To admit to a part. Not used.

vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv

TASTE AND SEE

What does it mean to “taste” God? Of course, David was not speaking of anything physical being ingested into our stomachs! “God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth” (Jn:4:24
). David could only have been using a physical illustration to refer to something spiritual: a deepening appreciation of God in the process of worshiping Him in spirit and in truth as Jesus said we must.

vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
Benson Commentary

TASTE

Psalm 34:8. O taste and see that the Lord is good — That is, kind, merciful, and gracious, namely, to all his people. The goodness of God, here spoken of, includes both the amiableness and benevolence of his nature, and the bounty and beneficence of his providence and grace; and, in calling us to taste and see this, the psalmist means that we should seriously, thoroughly, and affectionately consider it, and make trial of it by our own experience; which is opposed to those slight and vanishing thoughts that men usually have of the divine goodness. It is not sufficient that we find him to be a bountiful benefactor to us, but we must relish and take delight in his goodness manifested in and by his gifts, and in the contemplation of his infinite perfections and boundless love; and must be so convinced and persuaded of his goodness, as thereby to be encouraged, in the worst of times, to trust in him, and cast our care upon him.

vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv

FALL AWAY (from someone or something)

1. Lit. [for something] to drop away from someone or something. The paint is falling away from the sides of the house. Over the years, all the paint fell away.

2. Fig. [for someone] to move back or retreat from someone or something. The soldiers fell away from the line of battle.

3. Fig. to distance oneself from someone; to end an association with someone. The candidate's supporters fell away from her when they heard about the scandal.

See also: away, fall
McGraw-Hill Dictionary of American Idioms and Phrasal Verbs. © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

FALL AWAY

1. Also, fall off. Withdraw one's friendship, support, or allegiance. For example, After the divorce, her friends slowly fell away. [Early 1500s]

2. Also, fall off. Gradually decline in size or strength, as in The breeze slowly fell away, or, as Shakespeare put it ( King Lear, 1:2): "Love cools, friendship falls off, Brothers divide." [Early 1500s]

3. Drift from an established faith, cause, or principles. For example, I fell away from the Catholic Church when I was a teenager. [Early 1500]
See also: away, fall

VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV

I am NOT going to make any further comment as you were forced to do.
I am NOT changing any of the meanings.

They are there for all to see. It is not necessary for me to change anything or twist words because words MEAN WHAT THEY MEAN, not what YOU want them to mean.

As for Hebrews, you claim something or other about TRUE BELIEVERS.
Again, we have believers and "true" believers to accomodate your incorrect belief.

In my book there are only believers. You're either a believer or you're not.

I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO ASK AGAIN
PLEASE NAME ONE THEOLOGIAN WHO BELIEVED A PERSON COULD NOT LOSE THEIR SALVATION PRIOR TO JOHN CALVIN.
Thanks.
Fran
 
Apr 30, 2016
5,162
75
0
No one can lose their salvation for where is the glory of Jesus Christ as our Savior in that? How can we go around telling the Good News that Christ has saved us if it is still in the maybes?

Our message is not " Have you heard the POSSIBLE Good News to man? Jesus Christ MIGHT HAVE saved us. We do not know for sure, but He MIGHT HAVE." and smile so brightly, blinking like a happy little lamb? For what? In vain?

No. If we are not saved yet... then we are false witnesses of God for saying that Jesus Christ IS the Savior, BUT BECAUSE He is the Savior, then that can only mean we are saved.

The problem here is that believers mix up verses for discipleship as if mortifying the deeds of the body by the Spirit and running the race by faith in Jesus Christ as our author & finisher of our faith in laying aside every weight & sin is for salvation. It is not for salvation. It is for discipleship to be received as a vessel unto honor with crowns at the pre trib rapture event to AVOID being a castaway to face the coming fire on the earth and the coming great tribulation as a vessel unto dishonor in His House.
I wonder if anyone actually LISTENS TO WHAT IS BEING SAID???

1. Why do you say salvation is in the "maybes"?

2. Why is it the "possible" good news?

3. Why do you say Jesus MIGHT HAVE saved us?

4. Why are we not saved yet?

5. Vessels unto Honor and Crowns?
Nice concept.
So Jesus died to get you a crown?
NOT for salvation??
Was it Worth it for a crown??

Could you please list some verses where Jesus speaks about "crowns"??

Thanks
Fran
 
Apr 30, 2016
5,162
75
0
Hi Fran,

I would agree with James, that those who go out (fall away) James 2:18-19, where never part of us. They are worse than those who do not really know the gospel. The writer of Hebrews explains this very well:


[FONT=&]4 It is impossible for those who have once been enlightened, who have tasted the heavenly gift, who have shared in the Holy Spirit,[/FONT][FONT=&]5 who have tasted the goodness of the word of God and the powers of the coming age [/FONT][FONT=&]6 and who have fallen away, to be brought back to repentance. To their loss they are crucifying the Son of God all over again and subjecting him to public disgrace.[/FONT][FONT=&] (Hebrews 6:4-6)

[/FONT]
This does not mean that they were part of the invisible church that is Justified, but they were part of the visible church, they were given the light of the gospel and all the benefits of congregating with the elect, they tasted the heavenly gift, but were never real partakers.. a false faith.



I rather don' take your word for what the bible verses mean, since it's apparent you have your very own understanding of it.

COULD YOU PLEASE NAME ME ONE THEOLOGIAN THAT BELEIVE IN OSAS BEFORE JOHN CALVIN?

Thanks
Fran
 
Nov 22, 2015
20,436
1,430
0
There is a difference between tasting and drinking......Jesus knew of this concept too....Jesus "tasted" but did not drink.

Matthew 27:34 (KJV)
[SUP]34 [/SUP]
They gave him vinegar to drink mingled with gall: and when he had tasted thereof, he would not drink.

Matthew 26:27-28 (NASB)
[SUP]27 [/SUP]
And when He had taken a cup and given thanks, He gave it to them, saying, "Drink from it, all of you;

[SUP]28 [/SUP]
for this is My blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for forgiveness of sins.

John 7:37-38 (KJV)
[SUP]37 [/SUP] In the last day, that great day of the feast, Jesus stood and cried, saying, If any man thirst, let him come unto me, and drink.
[SUP]

38
[/SUP] He that believeth on me, as the scripture hath said, out of his belly shall flow rivers of living water.

John 4:14 (NASB)
[SUP]14 [/SUP] but whoever drinks of the water that I will give him shall never thirst; but the water that I will give him will become in him a well of water springing up to eternal life."


Shall never thirst again? Is this another one of those times where Jesus is supposedly lying to us again? Of course not. God in not a man that He should lie.
 
Apr 30, 2016
5,162
75
0
There is a difference between tasting and drinking......Jesus knew of this concept too....Jesus "tasted" but did not drink.

Matthew 27:34 (KJV)
[SUP]34 [/SUP]
They gave him vinegar to drink mingled with gall: and when he had tasted thereof, he would not drink.

Matthew 26:27-28 (NASB)
[SUP]27 [/SUP]
And when He had taken a cup and given thanks, He gave it to them, saying, "Drink from it, all of you;

[SUP]28 [/SUP]
for this is My blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for forgiveness of sins.

John 7:37-38 (KJV)
[SUP]37 [/SUP] In the last day, that great day of the feast, Jesus stood and cried, saying, If any man thirst, let him come unto me, and drink.
[SUP]

38
[/SUP] He that believeth on me, as the scripture hath said, out of his belly shall flow rivers of living water.

John 4:14 (NASB)
[SUP]14 [/SUP] but whoever drinks of the water that I will give him shall never thirst; but the water that I will give him will become in him a well of water springing up to eternal life."


Shall never thirst again? Is this another one of those times where Jesus is supposedly lying to us again? Of course not. God in not a man that He should lie.
You're getting desperate Grace.

There may be a difference between tasting and drinking in the worldy life,
But in the bible TASTE has a very specific meaning.

And YOU cannot change that meaning. The best OSAS'ers can do is to CHANGE meanings of words.
You have to, or your concept won't fit the bible.

Here's what TASTE means, not what you want it to mean comparing drinking and tasting. What could one possibly have to do with the other??? IOW, everytime the bible says taste, to you it means nothing...since it's not saying drinking???

vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv

TASTE
tast (Hebrew Ta`am, "the sense of taste," "perception," from Ta`am, "to taste," "to perceive"; Aramaic Te`em, "flavor," "taste" (of a thing); Hebrew chekh, "palate," "roof of the mouth" = "taste"; geuomai; noun geusis; in 2 Macc 7:1 the verb is ephaptomai):

(1) Literal:

(a) Gustation, to try by the tongue:

"The taste (ta`am) of it manna was like wafers made with honey" (Exodus 16:31); "Doth not the ear try words, even as the palate (chekh) tasteth (Ta`am) its food?" (Job 12:11); "Belshazzar, while he tasted (literally, "at the taste of," Te`em) the wine, commanded to bring the golden and silver vessels which Nebuchadnezzar his father had taken out of the temple which was in Jerusalem; that the king and his lords, his wives and his concubines, might drink therefrom" (Daniel 5:2).

(b) "To sample," "to eat but a small morsel":

"I did certainly taste (Ta`am) a little honey with the end of the rod that was in my hand; and, lo, I must die" (1 Samuel 14:43).

(2) Figurative:

"To experience," "to perceive":

"Oh taste and see that Yahweh is good" (Psalms 34:8;
compare 1 Peter 2:3); "How sweet are thy words unto my taste!" (margin "palate," chekh)
(Psalms 119:103); "That by the grace of God he should taste of death for every man"
(Hebrews 2:9); "For as touching those who were once enlightened and tasted of the heavenly gift,
and were made partakers of the Holy Spirit, and tasted the good word of God, and the powers of the age to come .... " (Hebrews 6:4,5).

vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv

Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary

1. (v. t.) To try by the touch; to handle; as, to taste a bow.
2. (v. t.) To try by the touch of the tongue; to perceive the relish or flavor of (anything) by taking a small quantity into a mouth. Also used figuratively.

3. (v. t.) To try by eating a little; to eat a small quantity of.

4. (v. t.) To become acquainted with by actual trial; to essay; to experience; to undergo.5. (v. t.)
To partake of; to participate in; -- usually with an implied sense of relish or pleasure.6. (v. i.)
To try food with the mouth; to eat or drink a little only; to try the flavor of anything; as, to taste of each kind of wine.

7. (v. i.) To have a smack; to excite a particular sensation, by which the specific quality or flavor is distinguished; to have a particular quality or character; as, this water tastes brackish; the milk tastes of garlic.

8. (v. i.) To take sparingly.

9. (v. i.) To have perception, experience, or enjoyment; to partake; as, to taste of nature's bounty.


H. L. E. Luering

Copyright Statement
These files are public domain.
Bibliography Information
Orr, James, M.A., D.D. General Editor. "Entry for 'TASTE'". "International Standard Bible Encyclopedia". 1915.

vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv

Do these verses mean NOTHING TO YOU because they TASTED instead of DRANK??
Maybe they should have been eliminated altogether since they mean nothing according to you??

vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv


Psalm 34:8New American Standard Bible (NASB)

8 O taste and see that the Lord is good;
How blessed is the man who takes refuge in Him!



1 Peter 2:3New American Standard Bible (NASB)

3 if you have tasted [a]the kindness of the Lord.




Hebrews 6:5New American Standard Bible (NASB)

5 and have tasted the good word of God and the powers of the age to come,




Psalm 119:103New American Standard Bible (NASB)

103 How sweet are Your [a]words to my taste!
Yes, sweeter than honey to my mouth!



Matthew 16:28New American Standard Bible (NASB)

28 “Truly I say to you, there are some of those who are standing here who will not taste death until they see the Son of Man coming in His kingdom.”



Hebrews 2:9New American Standard Bible (NASB)

Jesus Briefly Humbled
9 But we do see Him who was made [a]for a little while lower than the angels, namely, Jesus, because of the suffering of death crowned with glory and honor, so that by the grace of God He might taste death for everyone.

vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv

Again, no comment is necessary.
a 6th grader would know what the above means.

Just one:
Hebrews 2:9
"...HE MIGHT TASTE DEATH FOR EVERYONE"...


Does this not mean that Jesus DID DIE for everyone? HE TASTED DEATH.

If a person tastes Death, it means they DIE.


Fran
 
Apr 30, 2016
5,162
75
0
Actually Paul was getting direct revelation from Christ. He mentions it often.

It is not expedient for me doubtless to glory. I (Paul) will come to visions and revelations of the Lord.

And lest I should be exalted above measure through the abundance of the revelations, there was given to me a thorn in the flesh, the messenger of Satan to buffet me, lest I should be exalted above measure.

What? came the word of God out from you? or came it unto you only? If any man think himself to be a prophet, or spiritual, let him acknowledge that the things that I write unto you are the commandments of the Lord. But if any man be ignorant, let him be ignorant.

Whereof I am made a minister, according to the dispensation of God which is given to me (Paul) for you, to fulfil the word of God; (the only way you can get a mystery God his is for Christ to give/reveal it to him)

There are other verses I could list, but I think I have enough. Ok, one more.

Now to him that is of power to stablish you according to my gospel, and the preaching of Jesus Christ, according to the revelation of the mystery, which was kept secret since the world began,

Ok, maybe one more. Probably the best one of all actually.

But I certify you, brethren, that the gospel which was preached of me (Paul) is not after man. For I neither received it of man, neither was I taught it, but by the revelation of Jesus Christ.

Paul's mystery was not after man, it didn't come from man, he wasn't taught it, only given by revelation FROM Christ!
Hi RTP,
I'm reading everything you send.
All the Writers of the N.T. were inspired and revelation was given to them.
Not only revelation as in Paul's case, but some of the Writers actually spend time with Jesus. A lot of time. Over 3 years Worth.

Let's put that aside, since it's not important right now. Well, to you it iS, because you're saying Paul received revelation from Jesus. Well, do you no read the other Writers?

Also, If you had a choice, would you listen more to Jesus' words or to Paul's words?

Fran
 
Apr 30, 2016
5,162
75
0
Yes, Paul wrote 13 books in our bible. That has nothing to do with what I said though. I was making the point that everything I see you guys debate over verses. It's always taking a verse from Paul, and comparing it to Matt-John, Acts, Heb-Rev, and OT scriptures. That's not a coincidence. The verses mean what they say. That contradict Paul's gospel. But why? Because Paul has the MYSTERY revelations. A new gospel. A new dispensation from God. New instructions. A new creature; the body of Christ.

Howbeit we speak wisdom among them that are perfect: yet not the wisdom of this world, nor of the princes of this world, that come to nought: But we speak the wisdom of God in a mystery, even the hidden wisdom, which God ordained before the world unto our glory: Which none of the princes of this world knew: for had they known it, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.


It's pretty clear in that verse above that the things revealed to Paul were not known before. He didn't learn it from OT scriptures. Christ revealed something new. And it says in that same verse about that if God had NOT hid it, Christ would NOT have been crucified.
I know what you mean about how Paul's words are different than Jesus' words.

But do you believe that Jesus role FROM THE BEGINNING of time was to be Savior?
Do you believe that God knew we would need a Savior and supplied us with one that is God Himself?
What does this mean to you...
Genesis 3:15

Thanks
Fran
 

phil36

Senior Member
Feb 12, 2009
8,260
2,111
113
51
I rather don' take your word for what the bible verses mean, since it's apparent you have your very own understanding of it.

COULD YOU PLEASE NAME ME ONE THEOLOGIAN THAT BELEIVE IN OSAS BEFORE JOHN CALVIN?

Thanks
Fran
Hi Fran,

I certainly do have my own understanding of what scriptures say. I am not however, one of these 'I have my Bible and nothing else' men! I do read commentaries and early writings and modern writings and gleam diamonds - regarding scripture. I also understand that no one can rightly understand scripture unless the Holy Spirit illumines them The one man bible show tends to lead to grave errors and heresies. I think you may agree with that, whether or not you agree with the reformed theological view.

Augustine, He was the first formulate what he saw as the truth in scripture regarding this matter (against Palagianism). Before this there was no real debate or discussion relating to ones security in eternity, The early church had plenty of other things to worry about - like staying alive, errors and other heresies..

If you and I wanted to we could quote early church fathers until we are blue in the face, to promote our views, but this would do an injustice to the extent and context to which they were writing. Around the time of Augustine and before were the initial sparks of Roman Catholic beliefs which culminated in the Reformation, were Luther etc wrestled again with these topics using scripture. Calvin agreed with Augustine (using scripture). We all stand on the backs of giants as the saying goes. (Just take the reformation as an example - we believe with the reformers that justification is by Faith alone. I am sure even you will agree with that, no matter your view on sanctification.

I don't follow the man Calvin, but I agree with what he mostly says regarding the Faith. Just as you will agree with either Arminian or Wesleyan views (whether you admit to it or not, or, are aware of it or not!).

BTW Calvin wrote about Perseverance of the Saints. Not OSAS.
 
Nov 22, 2015
20,436
1,430
0
....so, if we "taste and see that the Lord is good" - now we are going to die? Just because there is a difference between drink and taste?

The word "taste" simply means to "try it out."

I for one - do not believe Jesus is a liar.

The Holy Spirit is with us forever Jesus said.

John 14:16-17 (NASB)
[SUP]16 [/SUP]"I will ask the Father, and He will give you another Helper, that He may be with you forever;

[SUP]17 [/SUP]that is the Spirit of truth, whom the world cannot receive, because it does not see Him or know Him, but you know Him because He abides with you and will be in you.

Ephesians 1:13 (NASB)
[SUP]13 [/SUP] In Him, you also, after listening to the message of truth, the gospel of your salvation—having also believed, you were sealed in Him with the Holy Spirit of promise,

The Spirit of truth is with us
forever!

2 John 1:2 (NASB)
[SUP]2 [/SUP] for
the sake of the truth which abides in us and will be with us forever:

Jesus said that
the
Holy Spirit will be with us and in us forever. John 14:16-17. Our Lord is NOT a liar.


John says we are safe in the Lord as He keeps us. Isn't that exciting to know that?
 
Apr 30, 2016
5,162
75
0
....so, if we "taste and see that the Lord is good" - now we are going to die? Just because there is a difference between drink and taste?

The word "taste" simply means to "try it out."

I for one - do not believe Jesus is a liar.

The Holy Spirit is with us forever Jesus said.

John 14:16-17 (NASB)
[SUP]16 [/SUP]"I will ask the Father, and He will give you another Helper, that He may be with you forever;

[SUP]17 [/SUP]that is the Spirit of truth, whom the world cannot receive, because it does not see Him or know Him, but you know Him because He abides with you and will be in you.

Ephesians 1:13 (NASB)
[SUP]13 [/SUP] In Him, you also, after listening to the message of truth, the gospel of your salvation—having also believed, you were sealed in Him with the Holy Spirit of promise,

The Spirit of truth is with us
forever!

2 John 1:2 (NASB)
[SUP]2 [/SUP] for
the sake of the truth which abides in us and will be with us forever:

Jesus said that
the
Holy Spirit will be with us and in us forever. John 14:16-17. Our Lord is NOT a liar.


John says we are safe in the Lord as He keeps us. Isn't that exciting to know that?
I don't understand your first sentence.
You're confusing two different verses I believe.

You keep repeating that you believe Jesus and He is not a liar.
I do believe you make Him out to be a liar.

Let's look at some words of Jesus Himself:

John 15:5-6 New American Standard Bible (NASB)

5 I am the vine, you are the branches; he who abides in Me and I in him, he bears much fruit, for apart from Me you can do nothing. 6 If anyone does not abide in Me, he is thrown away as a branch and dries up; and they gather them, and cast them into the fire and they are burned.


Matthew 4:4 New American Standard Bible (NASB)

4 But He answered and said, “It is written, ‘Man shall not live on bread alone, but on every word that proceeds out of the mouth of God.’”


Matthew 4:10 New American Standard Bible (NASB)

10 Then Jesus *said to him, “Go, Satan! For it is written, ‘You shall worship the Lord your God, and [a]serve Him only.’”




Matthew 4:17 New American Standard Bible (NASB)

17 From that time Jesus began to [a]preach and say, “Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.”



Matthew 5:13 New American Standard Bible (NASB)

Disciples and the World
13 “You are the salt of the earth; but if the salt has become tasteless, how [a]can it be made salty again? It is no longer good for anything, except to be thrown out and trampled under foot by men.


Matthew 5:48 New American Standard Bible (NASB)

48 Therefore [a]you are to be perfect, as your heavenly Father is perfect.



Matthew 7:17-19 New American Standard Bible (NASB)

17 So every good tree bears good fruit, but the bad tree bears bad fruit. 18 A good tree cannot produce bad fruit, nor can a bad tree produce good fruit. 19 Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire.



Matthew 7:21 New American Standard Bible (NASB)

21 “Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father who is in heaven will enter.



Matthew 10:32-33 New American Standard Bible (NASB)

32 “Therefore everyone who [a]confesses Me before men, I will also confess him before My Father who is in heaven. 33 But whoever [c]denies Me before men, I will also deny him before My Father who is in heaven.

vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv

THERE ARE MANY MANY MORE.

Here are some questions for you:

1. What happens to a person who DOES NOT ABIDE in Christ?

2. What happens to those who do not live by every word that comes out of the mouth of God?

3. What happens to those who do not worship God and serve HIM only?

4. Is one who denies God repenting and is he a member of the Kingdom of God?

5. Is someone who loses his salt good for anything according to Jesus?

6. Does a non-believer attempt to be "perfect" as our Father in heaven is perfect?

7. Is a non-believer attempting to bear good fruit?

8. Who enters into the Kingdom of Heaven?


Jesus has supplied you with the answers.

Someone who falls away and denies Christ,
IS HE A BELIEVER OR A NON-BELIEVER??


Fran
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,396
113
For all who believe you can lose salvation....How many times have you lost it and been resaved?

Hebrews states it is IMPOSSIBLE....so....either your all false, or deceiving yourselves..............I bet you will all say...OH we have never lost it because we ALWAYS do what is right, never sin and walk 100% according to the word of GOD.......for the few who will admit losing it....you might as well go party hard because Hebrews states you cannot get it back!

Unless Your Catholic and can buy your sins by paying the local priest off!
 
Apr 30, 2016
5,162
75
0
Hi Fran,

I certainly do have my own understanding of what scriptures say. I am not however, one of these 'I have my Bible and nothing else' men! I do read commentaries and early writings and modern writings and gleam diamonds - regarding scripture. I also understand that no one can rightly understand scripture unless the Holy Spirit illumines them The one man bible show tends to lead to grave errors and heresies. I think you may agree with that, whether or not you agree with the reformed theological view.

Who is the Holy Spirit not illuminating?
I think He's not illuminating YOU.
And you think He's not illuminating ME.
Who's right?
Do you think that MAYBE we could depend on the preponderance of theologians and even ECF, who where the theologians of their day? You know very well that OSAS holds no credit with these people. It's something that was manufactured after 1,500 years of Christianity. Could it be that all the doctors of the Church that came before Calvin were dumb and just did not see ths in scripture?

Are you aware that the idea of salvation as we know it today did not even exist back after Jesus ascension? You sound like a smart guy - I'll be you know that this concept came up in the 1800's.


Augustine, He was the first formulate what he saw as the truth in scripture regarding this matter (against Palagianism). Before this there was no real debate or discussion relating to ones security in eternity, The early church had plenty of other things to worry about - like staying alive, errors and other heresies..

Yes, and there wasn't any discussion on this after Augustine. The same Augustine who believed he had the answer to where evil comes from and later in life realized and admitted that really no one can know where evil comes from.
The ONLY one to even come close to Calvin. I mention Calvin because he brought forward this demonic idea that one could come to believe in The Christ at some point in life, and then become an unbeliever, but somehow, he's going to inherit the Kingdom of God just as we believers will. This is preposterous.

If you're familiar with the New Covenant, you know that the inheritance is after Jesus' Death ad you should also know that we have to be a PART of the New Covenant in order to RECEIVE that inheritance. Where is the justice of God if EVERYONE who believed at some time or other, gets the same inheriteance? Is God a just God or is He not??


If you and I wanted to we could quote early church fathers until we are blue in the face, to promote our views, but this would do an injustice to the extent and context to which they were writing. Around the time of Augustine and before were the initial sparks of Roman Catholic beliefs which culminated in the Reformation, were Luther etc wrestled again with these topics using scripture. Calvin agreed with Augustine (using scripture). We all stand on the backs of giants as the saying goes. (Just take the reformation as an example - we believe with the reformers that justification is by Faith alone. I am sure even you will agree with that, no matter your view on sanctification.
Why would my view on Justification or Sanctification be different from yours?? Do you think it is? Why?

I don't follow the man Calvin, but I agree with what he mostly says regarding the Faith. Just as you will agree with either Arminian or Wesleyan views (whether you admit to it or not, or, are aware of it or not!).
I agree with Arminius and Wesley, although I don't understand how Wesley could say our sin nature is dead, but that's a Whole different topic. These are SMALL differences that our MINDS could or could not accept. They do not affect our salvation.
LOSS OF FAITH affects our salvation. As is plainly shown in my last post to Grace777.

BTW Calvin wrote about Perseverance of the Saints. Not OSAS.

Yes. I know. We use the wrong term. The term should be eternal security which I use a lot, but we seem to like OSAS.
I'm flexible! You posted a good link re this, BTW.

Your sister in Christ
Fran
 
Last edited:
Apr 30, 2016
5,162
75
0
For all who believe you can lose salvation....How many times have you lost it and been resaved?

Hebrews states it is IMPOSSIBLE....so....either your all false, or deceiving yourselves..............I bet you will all say...OH we have never lost it because we ALWAYS do what is right, never sin and walk 100% according to the word of GOD.......for the few who will admit losing it....you might as well go party hard because Hebrews states you cannot get it back!

Unless Your Catholic and can buy your sins by paying the local priest off!
Are you talkin' ta me??

Your post is so silly, I won't even answer it.

Apparently your mind hears things I don't write.

Fran
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,396
113
Are you talkin' ta me??

Your post is so silly, I won't even answer it.

Apparently your mind hears things I don't write.

Fran
Did I name you? And if the boot fits, wear it....You teach you can lose it.....right?
 

phil36

Senior Member
Feb 12, 2009
8,260
2,111
113
51
Yes, and there wasn't any discussion on this after Augustine. The same Augustine who believed he had the answer to where evil comes from and later in life realized and admitted that really no one can know where evil comes from.
The ONLY one to even come close to Calvin. I mention Calvin because he brought forward this demonic idea that one could come to believe in The Christ at some point in life, and then become an unbeliever, but somehow, he's going to inherit the Kingdom of God just as we believers will. This is preposterous.

HiFran,

I read trough your response to my post and it would take a few post to respond to the misrepresentations. I have used one part as a demonstration (above).

No one says that what everyone has said is correct, Augustine certainly made some mistakes. And you make this point yourself, he realised his mistake and corrected it! Referring to Calvin, I don't agree with everything he said either. However, what both have said that can be held up by scripture I believe to be true.

I think you have overstepped the mark by saying Calvin brought forward a demonic idea. And this shows by you understanding of what Calvin said. Here's what you said:

Franc --- I mention Calvin because he brought forward this demonic idea that one could come to believe in The Christ at some point in life, and then become an unbeliever, but somehow, he's going to inherit the Kingdom of God just as we believers will. This is preposterous.
I quite agree that this is preposterous.. Calvin never said such a thing! How can you argue against something and call it demonic when you are ignorant to the facts of the thing you are arguing against? Plus, do you really believe that all reformed past present and future are following and teaching demonic doctrines.. if that is the case you are saying we are not saved. I would have to strongly disagree with you here.


Franc ---
If you're familiar with the New Covenant, you know that the inheritance is after Jesus' Death ad you should also know that we have to be a PART of the New Covenant in order to RECEIVE that inheritance. Where is the justice of God if EVERYONE who believed at some time or other, gets the same inheriteance? Is God a just God or is He not??

I agree with you that one must be in the covenant family to receive its blessings. Each person must persevere in their Faith (You will know what I mean if you know what perseverance of the Saints means (I have provided a link below on perseverance from a reformed perspective). I reject the idea that someone who is justified will ever fully or wholly fall away. God is a just and merciful God.


Franc ---
Are you aware that the idea of salvation as we know it today did not even exist back after Jesus ascension? You sound like a smart guy - I'll be you know that this concept came up in the 1800's.
I would agree that a lot of popular beliefs are of a modern nature.. I think that this is always a danger, no matter what generation we are in. This is mainly due to ignorance and forgetting the lessons from the past (we never seem to learn). However, I am not sure what ''concept'' you are referring to?

If you say that a man can fall away and somehow undo his justification and go to hell,, that is just a continuation theme from Roman Catholicism.

For anyone interested, here is a link to the reformed view of 'perseverance of the saints', even if you just want to know the facts of what it is.


An Exposition of the Westminster Confession of Faith
 
Last edited:

mailmandan

Senior Member
Apr 7, 2014
25,135
13,144
113
58
Hi Mailmandan,

I find it totally incredible that the OSAS crowd has to twist and turn and change scrpture and words to mean what THEY want it to mean.

You gave the correct meaning to each of the above phrases, but then, in usual manner, you twisted the meaning around to make it mean what suits you.
I did not twist anything around and I used Scripture to back up my arguments. At least you acknowledge that I gave the correct meaning to each of the above phrases.

3. Drift from an established faith, cause, or principles. For example, I fell away from the Catholic Church when I was a teenager. [Early 1500]
See also: away, fall
Established faith in what? I fell away from the Roman Catholic church when I was a teenager as well, but my faith was not firmly rooted and established in Christ, but was established in false religion at that time. As I already explained in Matthew 26:31, the remaining 11 disciples fell away as Jesus said they would fall away, yet this was not permanent and they did not lose their salvation. Those who permanently fall away demonstrate that their faith was not firmly rooted and established in Christ, as we saw with Judas Iscariot and those in 1 John 2:19.

I am NOT going to make any further comment as you were forced to do.
I am NOT changing any of the meanings.

They are there for all to see. It is not necessary for me to change anything or twist words because words MEAN WHAT THEY MEAN, not what YOU want them to mean.
The truth is there for all to see and so are your false accusations.

As for Hebrews, you claim something or other about TRUE BELIEVERS.
Again, we have believers and "true" believers to accomodate your incorrect belief.
There are genuine believers and there are make believers, which does not accommodate your incorrect belief. Throughout the entire book of Hebrews, yet where does it specifically say that a really "saved" person actually "lost their salvation?" Something this critical would surely be spelled out.

Hebrews 2:3 How shall we escape if we forsake so great a salvation - Did not give earnest heed to the things they heard, drifted away, did not escape, neglected and did not receive salvation.

Hebrews 3:6 IF we hold fast, we demonstrate that we ARE Christ's house. If we do not hold fast, we demonstrate that we are NOT Christ's house.

Hebrews 3:14 IF we hold fast, we demonstrate that we HAVE BECOME partakers of Christ. If we do not hold fast, we demonstrate that we have NOT become partakers of Christ.

Hebrews 4:1 Come short of entering His rest because of UNBELIEF.

Hebrews 4:2-3 For indeed the gospel was preached to US as well as to THEM; but the word which THEY heard did not profit THEM, not being mixed with faith in those who heard it. For we who have believed do enter that rest..

Hebrews 6:4 Those who have BEEN enlightened/tasters/partners, and FALLING away unable to restore.. This light either leads to the complete acceptance of Jesus Christ or produces condemnation in those who reject such light. Tasted, but would not drink, as in Matthew 27:34. Partners in his pre-salvation ministry, convicting of sin, righteousness and judgment to come by responding for a time to His drawing power intended to lead sinners to Christ, but after knowing and being convinced of the truth, they fall away by willfully rejecting it. Repentance "change our mind" enough to be convicted of and know the truth, but if we reject it, this would not be repentance unto life. Renew them once again unto salvation would be a definitive statement.

Hebrews 10:26 - To "sin willfully" in the Greek carries the idea of deliberate intention that is habitual, which stems from rejecting Christ deliberately. This is CONTINUOUS ACTION - A MATTER OF PRACTICE. The unrighteous practice sin - 1 Corinthians 6:9-10; Galatians 5:19-21, not the righteous, who are born of God - 1 Corinthians 6:11; 1 John 3:9. Descriptive of those who draw back to perdition and do not believe to the saving of the soul.

Hebrews 12:8 - Now if you are exempt from correction and left without discipline in which all [of God's children] share, then you are illegitimate offspring and "not true sons" [at all].

Hebrews 12:15 - See to it that no one misses the grace of God, comes short of it, fails to obtain it.

So throughout the book of Hebrews, we see a distinction between those in the group who draw back to perdition and those who believe to the saving of the soul. Those who draw back to perdition do not believe to the saving of the soul and those who believe to the saving of the soul do not draw back to perdition. Are you seeing this distinction? What we don't see is a verse that says a really "saved" Hebrew really "lost their salvation."

In my book there are only believers. You're either a believer or you're not.
Again, there are genuine believers and there are make believers. There is a stage in the progress of belief in Jesus that "falls short of genuine or consummated belief resulting in salvation." See John 2:23-25 (where their "belief" is clearly superficial in nature). Now read on in John 8:31-59 (where the Jews who were said to have "believed in him" turn out to be slaves to sin [v. 34], indifferent to Jesus’ word [v. 37], children of the devil [v. 44], liars [v. 55], attempted to stone Jesus (v. 59). Does that describe a genuine believer to you? Shallow, temporary belief that has no root, produces not fruit and withers away is not saving belief in Jesus.

I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO ASK AGAIN
PLEASE NAME ONE THEOLOGIAN WHO BELIEVED A PERSON COULD NOT LOSE THEIR SALVATION PRIOR TO JOHN CALVIN.
Thanks.
Fran
This is a typical question asked by Roman Catholics. I have not personally interviewed every theologian who existed prior to John Calvin. Have you? Can you infallibly say that NO theologian prior to John Calvin taught that a person could not lose their salvation? Jesus and the apostles were prior to John Calvin. What did Jesus say in John 6:37; 10:27-29? What did Paul say in Romans 8:30; 1 Corinthians 1:8; Ephesians 1:13-14; 4:30; Philippians 1:6? That's good enough for me. There are serious warning in the Bible to such people (see Hebrews 6:4-6 and 2 Peter 2:20-22) who have heard the Gospel, and after an initial response, they turn away from Christ. Their defection reveals that their hearts were never changed - Peter compares them to a washed pig returning to the mud, and the author of Hebrews, to a field that produces thorns and thistles after it receives the rain.

Nobody is saved by saying they have faith. Only true faith saves, the kind that continues to the end. God makes certain that the believer will remain safe for time and eternity. "For the LORD loves justice, and does not forsake His saints; they are preserved forever, (how long is forever?) but the descendants of the wicked shall be cut off" (Psalm 37:28).

I often hear Roman Catholics say that prior to the Reformation that nobody taught faith alone. To the contrary, we find:

Basil: "This is the true and perfect glorying in God, when a man is not lifted up on account of his own righteousness, but has known himself to be wanting in true righteousness and to be justified by faith alone in Christ."

Jerome: "When an ungodly man is converted, God justified him through faith alone, not on account of good works which he possessed not."

Chrysostom: "Again, they said that he who adhered to faith alone was cursed, but he shows that he who adhered to faith alone, is blessed."

Bernard of Clairvaux: "Shall not all our righteousness turn out to be mere unrighteousness and deficiency? What, then, shall it be concerning our sins, when not even our righteousness can answer for itself? Wherefore...let us flee, with all humility to Mercy which alone can save our souls...whoever hungers and thirsts after righteousness, let him believe in thee, who "justified the ungodly"; and thus, being justified by faith alone, he shall have peace with God."
 

mailmandan

Senior Member
Apr 7, 2014
25,135
13,144
113
58
I read through your response to my post and it would take a few post to respond to the misrepresentations.
So it's not just me. ;)

No one says that what everyone has said is correct, Augustine certainly made some mistakes. And you make this point yourself, he realised his mistake and corrected it! Referring to Calvin, I don't agree with everything he said either. However, what both have said that can be held up by scripture I believe to be true.
This is why ultimately, we rely upon "thus saith the Lord" and not fallible writings of fallible men.


If you say that a man can fall away and somehow undo his justification and go to hell,, that is just a continuation theme from Roman Catholicism.
Exactly!

For anyone interested, here is a link to the reformed view of 'perseverance of the saints', even if you just want to know the facts of what it is.
Thank you for the link. :)
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,396
113
So it's not just me. ;)

This is why ultimately, we rely upon "thus saith the Lord" and not fallible writings of fallible men.


Exactly!

Thank you for the link. :)
See post 514 and 515......She totally avoided it......

I still say that those who teach you can lose it miss the mark because...

1. Most will say they have never lost it which means they ALWAYS do what is right, never sin and have never fallen
2. The ones who will say they lost it....might as well party because Hebrews teaching it is impossible to regain it.....

Heaven will be empty if one actually believes they can lose ETERNAL LIFE given in faith........AS A GIFT I MIGHT ADD.....
 

AngelFrog

Senior Member
Feb 16, 2015
648
58
28
It's difficult to rebut such a long post. Maybe we could take one thing at a time?
Here's the first mistake I came across:

I recently spoke with a Church of Christ minister who believed that a Christian could LOSE their salvation by failing to maintain a “relationship” with God. Of course, that is a lie of the Devil

Why would the OP put relationship in quotes? Isn't it necessary to maintain a relationship with God? If I'm married to my husband, shouldn't I maintain a relationship with him? If I don't, am I married to him, separated, divorced?

God spoke of sons in the O.T. Israel was a "son". Also a metaphor for believers and for Jesus.
In the N.T. we read about the Sonship we have with God.

Could we disuss this? I hear that once we are sons of God, we cannot unbecome sons. I don't believe this is true. A son can be disinherited by a father. He could be kicked out of the home. Many times we hear fathers say " I no longer have a son." in God's case, this would be much more serious since our eternal soul is at risk.

We could do a whole study just on this. Let's start with this.

Romans 8.16 THE SPIRIT HIMSELF TESTIFIES WITH OUR SPIRIT THAT WE ARE CHILDREN OF GOD.

IF we stop believing in God, do we still have His spirit??

Fran
All manner of persons will argue against Christ and his work on the cross. But if you notice, the one's that argue we can lose our salvation are assured they are eternally saved themselves. It is others they're pointing at. But not with the power of God's word to sustain their argument.

The letters to the Hebrew church, the church at Corinth, are what are known as the pastoral letters of Paul. Letters he authored to manage his church.

The confusion arrives when reading those thinking they are God's dictates and as such appear to contradict what Jesus himself taught. Remembering that Saul (Paul) never heard Jesus preach and never met him while he was in the flesh. The 2nd Peter texts have long been an issue for scholars as to authenticity.

Therefore, being we are Christian, I think what is paramount is to go by what Christ himself taught. Because it was that teaching and covenant for which he was born to die and seal with his blood. The parable of the prodigal that Jesus delivered to his followers gave an apt description of that child of God that may backslide, fall away in faith, but yet is able to not only return to the way but shall be welcomed by the father with open arms and glad tidings and great celebration. As was the prodigal son. However, that parable also speaks of and to those who deny eternal salvation and security in the Father, through Jesus Christ.

That would be the reporting of the brother of that prodigal son who was not there to see the prodigal son return to the fold. And yet on hearing he did so was angry that he had walked away and yet was received by his father with gracious heart and open arms.

Think about what those who argue the Christian can lose their eternal salvation that was not their doing in the first place. But was afforded them by God's grace.

That Christian would have to undo all things that the father bestowed when that Christian repented and accepted Jesus as savior. Starting with God himself who would have to remember the sins of that fallen Christian yet again. After giving his word that he would remember their sins no more when they were saved.

That fallen Christian would have to be un-regenerate. They would have to evict the Holy Spirit that indwelt them the moment they repented and accepted Christ. That higher power that was mistaken in taking up residence in one that an omniscient father who's grace was afforded that Christian first, mistook as sincere when they repented.

No, I believe Jesus when he says those whom the father hath called to him shall enter into his hand and no one can remove them from there. That being because no one comes to Jesus unless called by the father first. Therefore, God knows who shall be open to the calling and who shall not. Just as God would know who were fake Christians and thus not truly in the covenant when they walked away preferring Hell to eternal life with God.

And yet the scriptures testify of that lot as well.

1 John 2:19


“They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would no doubt have continued with us: but they went out, that they might be made manifest that they were not all of us.”
 
Status
Not open for further replies.