I don't know who came up with that little bit of "wisdom" but I'm about sick of hearing it.
We are supposed to interpret what we read, and apply it to our lives. It's done with the help and guidance of the Holy Spirit of God, and if we prayerfully ask for guidance, we will receive it.
If someone goes strictly by what the Bible says, then an alcoholic would have to drink some wine, for the sake of his health, as Paul instructed Timothy.
What about a person that has a conscientious objection to eating pork? Who cares why, it just violates their conscience. The Word says to go ahead and eat anything, even pork. Should that person not "interpret" the scripture to understand that he should not, if it violates his conscience?
Of COURSE people read and interpret the Bible... as it should be.
This about eating meat used to really confuse me.
On the one hand, it gives instruction for those who are stronger in their faith, to keep them free from being yoked by others.
On the other hand, it gives instruction for those who are weaker to listen to their conscience.
But then God showed me that it is similar to how the law used to be our guardian.
Our conscience, even on it's worst and most confused day, leads our heart.
When we go by our conscience, something has tapped our heart and said, this might be wrong.
So until more renewing of our mind and heart and more growth in the holiness of Christ, the conscience on it's worst day is better than no conscience at all, because at least our response is from the heart.
So until this renewing and strengthening, the conscience is like a guardian. A guardian until the better comes. It can be a faulty guardian, but it's better to listen than to not listen, thereby searing it.
But then my next confusion was - but Lord, I see some manipulating of conscience in these younger and weaker brothers, by those who seek to yoke them all over again...what good is any of it if when their minds and hearts are renewed and strengthened more if these manipulators just use their new strength and freedom to get them to do what they want anyway by saying they should not do or should do a certain thing if it causes another to stumble?? The end result is that they themselves are free but the younger don't understand and follow the example? Aren't you, in a sense, allowing their growth to be stunted rather than grown if you allow it?
He and I are still working on that one, but it is only HIM who causes the growth. And looking for fruit is important here too, because there are some loving brothers and sisters who are wrong in this or that but the fruit still shows, even in disagreement over a matter. And in that matter, they themselves are still unrenewed of mind. But we can allow a fifteen year old to watch a two year old if they are wise, conscientious, mature in most ways. The toddler won't die.
But where there is no love, that's where to push the issue and say, no, you are not renewed in any matter. You are not walking in love. There is no fruit. You can't watch a toddler. You may kill them if we leave you alone with them and your motive isn't love at all - it's hatred and control of others and manipulation.