Two things God wants for you.

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
36,665
13,127
113
#41
You are still being Calvinistic about this without admitting it.

Why did Jesus bother to stand up in acts 7:55, if the Sanhedrin did not legitimately have the free choice to decide whether or not to accept Stephen preaching?
just quoting scripture. if you want to call it names it's not by my account. it won't help you understand it by putting it in one of your imaginary boxes, tho, IMO.
 
Jan 12, 2019
7,497
1,399
113
#42
just quoting scripture. if you want to call it names it's not by my account. it won't help you understand it by putting it in one of your imaginary boxes, tho, IMO.
Ok you disagree with my view, no surprise. I quoted scripture and so do you but we interpret them differently.

Cheers
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
36,665
13,127
113
#43
Why did Jesus bother to stand up in acts 7:55

I will greatly praise the Lord with my mouth;
yes, I will praise Him among the multitude,
for He shall stand at the right hand of the poor,
to save him from those who condemn him.
(Psalm 109:30-31)
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
36,665
13,127
113
#44
Ok you disagree with my view, no surprise. I quoted scripture and so do you but we interpret them differently.

Cheers
you don't seem to even comprehend what i've said - how would you know if you disagree with it?
 
Jan 12, 2019
7,497
1,399
113
#45
you don't seem to even comprehend what i've said - how would you know if you disagree with it?
I believed the Sanhedrin could have accepted Jesus as the promised messiah in acts 7

You disagree that they could have.
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
36,665
13,127
113
#46
where the Jewish nation, represented by the Sanhedrin, rejected Jesus as their promised Messiah and King for the final time, thus God caused all Israel to be blinded for a temporary time
try Isaiah 6:9 and Mark 4:12.

this is only half a chapter after Christ chose the 12. and He doesn't say they are blinded ((at that very time!)) in order not to enjoy an earthly kingdom, but in order that they do not turn and be forgiven. He's not there to set up an earthly kingdom.

if you think Jesus' plan was to come and set up an earthly kingdom, but His intentions were regrettably stymied, then i'm afraid i don't see any support for that in scripture at all. the Bible pretty clearly paints a picture very much the opposite of that: Jesus Christ was rejected as king long before the incarnation, and for a thousand years His prophets had been predicting that He would come, be rejected, suffer and rise. no individual's ignorance of that changes the facts.
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
36,665
13,127
113
#47
I believed the Sanhedrin could have accepted Jesus as the promised messiah in acts 7
Christ had already died. and risen. and ascended. and sent the Spirit.

You disagree that they could have.
i've never said that.
please don't put words in my mouth while you don't understand the ones already there.
 
Jan 12, 2019
7,497
1,399
113
#48
Christ had already died. and risen. and ascended. and sent the Spirit.

So is that an agree or disagree? What do you think Peter was trying to urge the Jews to do in acts?
 

KelbyofGod

Senior Member
Oct 8, 2017
1,881
717
113
#49
Hello again Kelby, since the blood of bulls and goats saved* no one in OT times, 1. what was the purpose of the sacrifices and 2. what is it then that actually does atone for their sins (and satisfies the wrath of the Father against them)?

*(my question about OT saints that you replied to above did not concern Christian water baptism for obvious reasons).

Thanks :)

~Deut
Hi Deuteronomy,

Much of the OT still seems a mystery to me and usually I don't try too hard to answer about the significance of most OT topics...but God has started to open my eyes and understanding to SOME things, so I'll do my best to answer your questions using what he's shown me so far. Please bear in mind that I'm not claiming these to be fully comprehensive answers...just "through a glass, darkly".

In answer to your first question, I think he gave the commandments regarding sacrifices for at least 3 reasons:

1. To see (find out) if they would HEAR his voice. A person hasn't truly heard the message until they've done the action (because part of the message is contained in the doing). This relates to the 1st commandment in so many ways.
2. To show them the pattern of what the true sacrifice MUST accomplish. This is not a single-step, quick fix slaying; but rather a very detailed, very deliberate set of rules which must all be satisfied or else the sacrifice will not be accepted.
3. To teach them that redemption is NOT FREE...the cost of sin (and price of redemption) is HIGH. God was showing them that although they will be receiving the benefits of the sacrifice freely, the one MAKING the sacrifice (the one who IS the sacrifice) will be paying a great price. This is not only regarding the Messiah. Don't overlook what those OT animals were giving up. And don't underestimate the cost of what "come, take up the cross and follow me" really means. Matthew 16:24, Mark 8:34, Mark 10:21, Luke 9:23


In answer to your second question about what atoned for the sins of the OT people:

There is only one sacrifice that truly atones for sin...and that is Jesus (because he is the one true sacrifice for sin, forever... Hebrews 10:12, Heb 7:27, Heb 9:26, etc). However, the question still remains (even if not directly spoken) of "How does one attach him-or-herself to this sacrifice in the OT? because obviously some receive and walk in the benefit of the sacrifice... and some do not."

I've been talking about how it is done in the NEW testament, but you're asking about the OLD testament. I think it is worth finding out and discussing, but I personally don't have a clear enough understanding (nor the time to write it here) at this time. I do however know that it pre-dates the sacrifices, pre-dates the law, and pre-dates the Abrahamic covenant of circumcision. It's got something to do with promise, faith, and the heart of man (what a particular man truly wants good/bad regardless of his level of knowledge at the time).

Love in Jesus,
Kelby
 

KelbyofGod

Senior Member
Oct 8, 2017
1,881
717
113
#50
sure thing I’ve checked out what the OT says the reason for circumcising and appears to be this.

here’s what I’ve read

Gen 17
12Generation after generation, every male must be circumcised when he is eight days old, including those born in your household and those purchased from a foreigner—even those who are not your offspring. 13Whether they are born in your household or purchased, they must be circumcised. My covenant in your flesh will be an everlasting covenant.

14But if any male is not circumcised, he will be cut off from his people; he has broken My covenant.”


you mentioned this below in one of your post maybe I am misreading what your saying as it was the submission that brought them into covenant or maybe I’m misreading that after eight days the circumcised male child was brought into the covenant by the circumcise.
.
.
Also, it wasn't the physical removal of a piece of flesh (circumcision) that suddently made them worthy... It was submission to that God-established act (by faith) that brought them into the covenant.
There were two things going on at circumcision:
1. the physical removal of a foreskin
2. the willing submission to God's bidding

In baptism for remission of sins there are also 2 things going on:
1. a person is being submerged in water
2. the willing submission to God's bidding

It's not the physical action that makes it work, (otherwise a person's sins would go away whenever a friend pushed them into the pool). It is the willing submission to God's bidding that gives it power...but the physical has to be there, too, or else the willing-submission-to-God's-bidding is absent.

Love in Jesus,
Kelby
 
Jun 10, 2019
4,304
1,659
113
#51
There were two things going on at circumcision:
1. the physical removal of a foreskin
2. the willing submission to God's bidding

In baptism for remission of sins there are also 2 things going on:
1. a person is being submerged in water
2. the willing submission to God's bidding

It's not the physical action that makes it work, (otherwise a person's sins would go away whenever a friend pushed them into the pool). It is the willing submission to God's bidding that gives it power...but the physical has to be there, too, or else the willing-submission-to-God's-bidding is absent.

Love in Jesus,
Kelby
there’s the old covenant and the new covenant that’s how I see it.
 

Deuteronomy

Well-known member
Jun 11, 2018
3,217
3,546
113
67
#52
There is only one sacrifice that truly atones for sin...and that is Jesus (because he is the one true sacrifice for sin, forever... Hebrews 10:12, Heb 7:27, Heb 9:26, etc). However, the question still remains (even if not directly spoken) of "How does one attach him-or-herself to this sacrifice in the OT? because obviously some receive and walk in the benefit of the sacrifice... and some do not."
Hi again Kelby, I think a good place to begin looking for the answer to that question may be here: Romans 3:25-26.

~Deut
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
24,446
12,931
113
#53
Hi again Kelby, I think a good place to begin looking for the answer to that question may be here: Romans 3:25-26.
Kelby is not looking for biblical answers. He is simply promoting his false doctrine of baptismal regeneration. And no matter how many Scriptures you show him that refute his doctrine, he remains adamant in his beliefs. That is usually the case with all who hold to false teachings. They love the lie more than the truth.
 
Jan 12, 2019
7,497
1,399
113
#54
Kelby is not looking for biblical answers. He is simply promoting his false doctrine of baptismal regeneration. And no matter how many Scriptures you show him that refute his doctrine, he remains adamant in his beliefs. That is usually the case with all who hold to false teachings. They love the lie more than the truth.
There is a significant group of Christians who either believe in:
  1. the necessity of water baptism to get saved, or
  2. the necessity immediately after you are saved, otherwise you may not be saved since you are disobeying a direct commandment from the risen Lord, which to me amounts to pretty much the same as the first belief.
In my previous discussion with you about this, you appear to fall under the 2nd category.

What we differ is that you don't think 2 is the same as 1.
 
Jan 12, 2019
7,497
1,399
113
#55
Hi Deuteronomy,

Much of the OT still seems a mystery to me and usually I don't try too hard to answer about the significance of most OT topics...but God has started to open my eyes and understanding to SOME things, so I'll do my best to answer your questions using what he's shown me so far. Please bear in mind that I'm not claiming these to be fully comprehensive answers...just "through a glass, darkly".

In answer to your first question, I think he gave the commandments regarding sacrifices for at least 3 reasons:

1. To see (find out) if they would HEAR his voice. A person hasn't truly heard the message until they've done the action (because part of the message is contained in the doing). This relates to the 1st commandment in so many ways.
2. To show them the pattern of what the true sacrifice MUST accomplish. This is not a single-step, quick fix slaying; but rather a very detailed, very deliberate set of rules which must all be satisfied or else the sacrifice will not be accepted.
3. To teach them that redemption is NOT FREE...the cost of sin (and price of redemption) is HIGH. God was showing them that although they will be receiving the benefits of the sacrifice freely, the one MAKING the sacrifice (the one who IS the sacrifice) will be paying a great price. This is not only regarding the Messiah. Don't overlook what those OT animals were giving up. And don't underestimate the cost of what "come, take up the cross and follow me" really means. Matthew 16:24, Mark 8:34, Mark 10:21, Luke 9:23


In answer to your second question about what atoned for the sins of the OT people:

There is only one sacrifice that truly atones for sin...and that is Jesus (because he is the one true sacrifice for sin, forever... Hebrews 10:12, Heb 7:27, Heb 9:26, etc). However, the question still remains (even if not directly spoken) of "How does one attach him-or-herself to this sacrifice in the OT? because obviously some receive and walk in the benefit of the sacrifice... and some do not."

I've been talking about how it is done in the NEW testament, but you're asking about the OLD testament. I think it is worth finding out and discussing, but I personally don't have a clear enough understanding (nor the time to write it here) at this time. I do however know that it pre-dates the sacrifices, pre-dates the law, and pre-dates the Abrahamic covenant of circumcision. It's got something to do with promise, faith, and the heart of man (what a particular man truly wants good/bad regardless of his level of knowledge at the time).

Love in Jesus,
Kelby
It was ultimately faith that saved in both the OT and NT, faith in obeying what God command you to do at each time period.

It began in Genesis 4:7, where God told Cain he would have been accepted had he "done the right thing", which means bringing the correct sacrifice.

So in the OT, the Jews were saved by faith in what God revealed to them.

And what did God reveal to them during that time? "Keep the Law of Moses, circumcise your male kids, and offer an animal sacrifice every time you sin."

As long as they do that, God considers that as "putting their faith in him" and he will see them as righteous before him, as what the prophet Balaam found out in Numbers 23:18-21.

But now, in the NT, God is telling us a different way to come to him, that is to cease from our works and trust in Jesus's death burial and resurrection.

We obey that requirement and God will similarly impute our faith as righteousness.
 

ForestGreenCook

Well-known member
Jul 8, 2018
8,318
1,185
113
#56
Before we go too much further discussing baptism (I really appreciate the comments I've read so far...up to #18 ) I want to point out that baptism is only 1 of TWO things God wants us to have.

So at some point we'll probably move towards talking about what it means to actually receive the Holy Ghost.. assuming you feel the Holy Ghost is important enough that we should seek to know the truth about it and not just rely on what others have told us, just in case they are blind leaders of the blind.

Love in Jesus,
Kelby
We received the Holy Ghost after God ascended. Jesus said that he would send the Holy Ghost and he would be in us and would reveal all things whatsoever Jesus taught. When we are baptized, which is a commandment that we should do, we already have the indwelling of the Holy Spirit, but we will receive the "gift" of the Holy Spirit which is revelation.
 

ForestGreenCook

Well-known member
Jul 8, 2018
8,318
1,185
113
#57
There is a significant group of Christians who either believe in:
  1. the necessity of water baptism to get saved, or
  2. the necessity immediately after you are saved, otherwise you may not be saved since you are disobeying a direct commandment from the risen Lord, which to me amounts to pretty much the same as the first belief.
In my previous discussion with you about this, you appear to fall under the 2nd category.

What we differ is that you don't think 2 is the same as 1.
Have you ever directly disobeyed a commandment from God? I think it says only Jesus never committed a sin.
 
Jan 12, 2019
7,497
1,399
113
#58
Have you ever directly disobeyed a commandment from God? I think it says only Jesus never committed a sin.
Christians are dead to the Law once they are married to Jesus (Romans 7)
Sin is not imputed when there is no Law (Romans 5:13)

You must understand that when Paul talks about sin in his epistles, he almost always refer to sin as a noun, and not a verb.
 

ForestGreenCook

Well-known member
Jul 8, 2018
8,318
1,185
113
#59
Christians are dead to the Law once they are married to Jesus (Romans 7)
Sin is not imputed when there is no Law (Romans 5:13)

You must understand that when Paul talks about sin in his epistles, he almost always refer to sin as a noun, and not a verb.
Those that God gave to his Son to die for are looked upon by God as holy and without blame as far as eternal salvation is concerned, but the born again child of God commits sins now and then as he lives his life here until he dies a natural death. Paul explains this by his own example in the Galatians letter.
 
Jan 12, 2019
7,497
1,399
113
#60
Those that God gave to his Son to die for are looked upon by God as holy and without blame as far as eternal salvation is concerned, but the born again child of God commits sins now and then as he lives his life here until he dies a natural death. Paul explains this by his own example in the Galatians letter.
You don’t understand the difference between a.noun and a verb?