Your post here is exactly why you and others who hold to this type of thinking do not understand the book of Revelation.
Hi Ahwatukee thanks for the reply. The spiritual unseen understanding works the best for me.
2Co 4:18 While we look not at the things which are seen, but at the things which are not seen: for the things which are seen are temporal; but the things which are not seen are eternal.
God did do not leave us a orphans with no instructions as to how we can seek after the approval of God. He has given us the proper prescriptions. And they do not include ignore the eternal spiritual understanding found in a parables in favor of walking by sight after the things seen, the temporal.
It is not a salvation issue but I think more of a way on how can we walk by faith the unseen and not by sight as that seen.
It is there between the temporal things of men seen and the eternal of God the unseen that the father of lies can get his foot in the door to sell his murderess lies.
By providing us parables we can see the gospel working in the affairs of men right from the beginning. According to Christ the Holy Spirit without a parable the word of God speaks not.
We begin looking for the gospel hid in parables the gospel thread is woven throughout the scriptures .
When you said thinking do not understand the book of Revelation. Did you mean the book that is signified using signs seen, the temporal to reveal the spiritual things not seen, and the eternal? It would seem like the correct hermeneutics when looking at parables.
Remember it cannot be over emphasized, again without parables Christ the Holy Spirit of God spoke not, purposely hiding the spiritual faith principle from natural man who naturally seek after that literally seen, to avoid the searching out the spiritual understanding through what I would call the three avenues of the serpent who has no form so that he can make his spiritual presence known..
1John 2:16 For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world.
According to my understanding I would think we can compare faith to faith, or the unseen spiritual to the unseen eternal as to its understanding... hid from natural man .
But as it is written, Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for them that love him.But God hath revealed them unto us by his Spirit: for the Spirit searcheth all things, yea, the deep things of God.For what man knoweth the things of a man, save the spirit of man which is in him? even so the things of God knoweth no man, but the Spirit of God.Now we have received, not the spirit of the world, but the spirit which is of God; that we might know the things that are freely given to us of God... 1Co 2:9
Christ purposely hid the meaning from parables to teach the apostles how to rightly divide the word of God, mixing faith (Christ’s) the unseen in what they did hear or see. Three times they insisted on walking by sight after that the things seen the literal . Christ rebuked them and informed them you know not what manner of spirit they were of.
Whenever they turned things upside down like that their eyes would go off of Christ and play the game “who is the greatest”. Again walking by sight looking to the literal .
Luk 9:55 But he turned, and rebuked them, and said, Ye know not what manner of spirit ye are of.
All of those places within scripture that labeled "not literal" is by conjecture! On what basis are you concluding that these things as not being literal? By stamping them as non literal, you discard the truth and miss the true meaning. In actuality, you have flat out denied everything that the scripture is stating:
There are literally lying spirits that have no form or substance as rudiments of this world. Lying spirits have no way to procreate. I am not stamping out the literal but defining that not seen, the eternal, by the things seen the temporal.
There is nothing in the scripture above that infers that the angel is not a literal angel that will descend to seize the dragon.
An angel is a messenger of God as a spirit not seen.
It’s what we wrestle against the literal unseen . When Satan the lead messenger a murderer from the beginning worked by literally appearing in a form of another creature as one that was formed after the rudiments of this world a (serpent) and puts his thoughts on its lips (you shall not surely die) the murder took place.
God did not want them to learn by experience (instant gratitude) what it mean to walk by faith the unseen. They died because they looked to the literal as that seen.
Whether the key is corporeal or non corporeal, the fact is that it is required to both open and close the Abyss. For in Rev.9:1, we saw that an angel opened the Abyss with that same key. For prior to that it was locked and those demonic beings where unable to come out of the Abyss until it was opened. Furthermore, the Abyss is also literal, being the same place that those demons collectively called "Legion" begged Jesus not to send them into, as revealed in Luke 8:30. The Abyss is also the place where the beast is currently restricted in, as revealed in Rev.9:1.
The key is the gospel that the gates of hell the bottom less pit or unending judgment will not prevail against as that not seen .It loosen the believer binding the father of lies.
The dragon is symbolic representing Satan as the scripture itself immediately reveals or are you also going to claim that Satan is not literal either?
Yes it represents the father of lies no literal chain could hold Him
The words 'thousand years" appear six times within Rev.20:1-7 and therefore should be interpreted as being literal since there is nothing in the scripture that would suggest otherwise.
Other than without parables Christ spoke not?
A thousand years are
as a day .The word
as denotes a parable is in view and the spiritual understand hid from natural man must be sought out if we are going to hear what the Spirit says to the churches .. The word thousand as it is used over and over represents a unknown
The term thousand is employed many, many times in Scripture, in varying figurative senses, to describe large numbers or vast periods of time. The expressions are also commonly used to symbolically describe great pictures of immeasurable vastness.
Psa 90:4 For a thousand years in thy sight are but as yesterday when it is past, and as a watch in the night.
2Peter 3:8 But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.
Ecclesiastes 6:6 Yea, though he live a thousand years twice told, yet hath he seen no good: do not all go to one place?
Everything that God is revealing to us you have blatantly denied by spiritualizing everything.
We are to compare the spiritual understanding to the spiritual.God is not a man as us.
The Lord rebuke you for distorting his word!
Distorting I believe would be to look to the literal as that seen the temporal and not that hid the spiritual understanding. In that way it would seem you are rebuking me for the right manner of Spirit "walking by faith" (2 Corinthians 4:18). The apostles were following your line of reasoning. Make Christ disappear (out of sight out of mind) and play “who is the greatest” by looking at the temporal .
Let these sayings sink down into your ears: for the Son of man shall be delivered into the hands of men.
But they understood not this saying, and it was hid from them, that they perceived it not: and they feared to ask him of that saying.Then there arose a reasoning among them, "which of them should be greatest". Luk 9:44
Luk 9:55 But he turned, and rebuked them, and said, Ye know not what manner of spirit ye are of.
Why look to the literal as that seen with our eyes or hear with the ear of natural man and not what the Spirit is saying to the churches? It why he faulted the Nicolaitanes. they too insisted on walking by sight after that literally seen.