Not at all, but as a gender, do not men take responsibility for the **edited** in the world? Look at oncefallen's response. He blamed men, and in general, he said it was all on a man's shoulder's to fix things. I take this as all men are to blame for the few. This puts it on our own shoulders to fix things that a few might do, as we end up taking care of the single mothers, the divorced women, etc (which is at a record high in the world, might I add). That's our reward, and a lot of times, men take that up and show what real men are capable of, based on a woman's mistakes with some asshole guy. In the end, we take up that burden. It isn't fair, and it isn't right, but we do it anyway. Why are women so against doing this as well? I've not even heard much of a "there are women you should avoid" type of statement either. I've not even heard one single statement about why divorce laws should be changed for the better, or rape laws, or sexual harassment laws, etc. I've not heard a peep about those things, and really, the closest answer to that has been along the lines of "If men don't do the right thing, you will get divorced!" as if that's an okay statement to make. How is that a statement anyone should be making as Christians?
It just leaves me with the idea of when is enough enough, and more-so, why is never an answer for men, but any bit of neglect an answer for women? If we are all equal as far as gender, then why is all responsibility on men at all times? If a woman cheats on her man, the man is told he needs to be like Jesus and to forgive. If a man cheats on his woman, he is divorced, and most will say it is justified. I see a large gap in the process here, if we are to be completely equal with things.
I know some of you think I created this thread based on past hurt, but that really isn't what my intention was. I was just asking a legitimate question, and while the title and things might have been misleading, the idea remains the same: Women seem to be the ones initiating almost all divorce cases (there are always the exceptions, but I'm looking at the general norm), and men keep getting blamed as if everything lie on their shoulders. I've gone into every relationship I've had based on that idea, that it is all on my shoulders, it is my burden to bear as a man. Every relationship ended with me hanging on too long to a bad situation, trying to fix things on my own, and the women all seem to believe it was all up to me as well. The responsibility and blame game has generally always been on the man's shoulders, but I'm asking why is that? If we can't take blame equally on both sides, how will any relationship work out? No man can take the burden being placed on his shoulders forever. Every cracks eventually without support. If I even put a slight bit of blame on women, I get called a bunch of things, none of which are pleasant. Am I touching home here a bit too close to someone's heart, or what is it? Why is it that nobody wants to take blame for anything? Generally speaking, I brought up feminism as a case point, because you don't see very many masculine right movements. The sexual revolution changed a lot of things, some of them good, but clearly some of them were bad. I think it takes both genders to realize the problems, but if one side is always blamed, and the other acts blameless because they personally might not see themselves as offenders, how is anything fixed for the overall good?
Let me put it this way: If every black person in the 60's were all for themselves, blaming everyone else and not standing together on racial awareness, how would Martin Luther King ever have succeeded? We put that idea on his shoulders, as if he did everything, but he was just one of very many. If everyone acted individually, nothing would've occurred, and if everyone said "this never happened to me!" or "I've never done this, don't blame me!" than nobody would've fixed things. The same goes for feminism of any era, because if just one woman said all these things, and the vast majority of women didn't join in, nothing would've happened. Women from all over joined in on the cause, and clearly women from all over didn't enjoy being regulated to housewives, and the few that did enjoy it still supported the cause of other women who didn't.
For all the happy marriages out there, there is a 50% rate of unhappily married couples, and that is the highest it has ever been. What are the reasons? If it is ONLY based on who is following Jesus, than you'd think you'd see much higher than 50%. Beyond that, you'd think it would've ALWAYS been high, because people haven't been following Jesus throughout history. That doesn't seem to have affected marriage much, so I think that idea is farfetched, and even if it is definitely a point, it isn't the entire reason. Clearly something else changed marriage, and clearly something else is the reason marriages aren't working. If it was only Christianity, than nobody outside of Christianity would ever stay married. That isn't the case either.