why?
because paul did in romans 10 and 11.
should I twist pauls words and call him a liar? Say he said really something else. Or change the meaning of what he said just so it fits my own belief system?
salvation is not the issue here, you all want to make a salvation issue where there is no,
unbelieving Isreal will NOT be restored to her land and live in peace, they will Not recieve Jesus as her king, and they will NOT be a testimony to the world
this is why there is never any real discussion, because you all base your whole attack against dispensational thinking on the bases false Interpretation of what it means
as long as you do this, there will never be any real fruitful discussion
because paul did in romans 10 and 11.
should I twist pauls words and call him a liar? Say he said really something else. Or change the meaning of what he said just so it fits my own belief system?
salvation is not the issue here, you all want to make a salvation issue where there is no,
unbelieving Isreal will NOT be restored to her land and live in peace, they will Not recieve Jesus as her king, and they will NOT be a testimony to the world
this is why there is never any real discussion, because you all base your whole attack against dispensational thinking on the bases false Interpretation of what it means
as long as you do this, there will never be any real fruitful discussion
What does the word Israel mean? And which one seeing all Isreal is not what it was intended to mean . Is Jacob part of Israel seeing his named was changed for some reason ? what does the old name Jacob mean?