But then we run into the problem of, "Who" gets to define "Who" a real Christian is and "Who" fits the bill or not... It really doesn't bother me when people accuse me of "not being Christian enough" or fitting their definitions. I figure, just like them, we'll all find out someday.
I've honestly also always wondered if atheists have this problem.
Do atheists sit around and accuse each other of NOT believing enough? ("You can't fool me... YOU BELIEVE IN SOMETHING. I KNOW YOU DO!!!")
What, exactly, would you call a supposed unbeliever who doesn't unbelieve enough?
Not that I'd ever subscribe to atheism. But after growing up in churches all my life, I've always wondered if atheists argue about things like that.
That's not really a problem, bc no one gets to define that for an individual anyway, a person is either saved, (a christian), or they're not. But just as the fact that in any given church on any give sunday there are those that are not saved (yet, we'll say), that fact is the same on any given chat site as well. The difference is that ppl are expected to be more vocal here, so you're gonna have some ppl who talk a good game, but are not really 'christian'. Again, it's not a matter of degrees, they either are or they're not. The fruit of the spirit is love. Love manifests in joy, peace, longsuffering, etc. We don't have to be fruit inspectors, ..... we will KNOW them by their love.
Btw, who told you you weren't a christian? Smack 'em upside the head!
(Atheists arguing about not unbelieving enough...lol. That's really funny! I'd love to listen in on one of those debates. "Well, I believe WAY less than you!" "Oh, yeah?! Well I don't believe you!" Lol.) Say goodnight, Gracie. Goodnight Gracie, I mean George.