The key word in 1Tim 2:12 is 'I'. It does not say that God suffers not a woman to teach but rather is stating Paul's particular point of view. As with a lot of Paul's writing it appears that he offering his learned opinion rather that firmly stating what God does or does not allow. The thing about 1Cor 14:33, not all women have a husband to inquire about matters whether they are home or otherwise. Paul appears to be a bit of a chauvinist.
The bottom line is what kind of teaching? Do we take it for granted that its the gospel and men are better teachers??? No way...
It cannot represent teaching the gospel or declaring the word of God. The time of reformation had come. Men and woman could now worship and perform the new ceremonial laws together previously separated by a high wall a pagan design . .It caused a problem just like when woman became more involved in the work market in the 60s and up....
And it shall come to pass in the last days, saith God, I will pour out of my Spirit upon
all flesh: and your sons and your
daughters shall prophesy, and your
young men shall see visions, and your old men shall dream dreams: Acts 2:17
The scripture is clear in that way and informs us we need no man or woman to teach .We preach the word or plant the seed he causes the growth if any. Growth does not depend on the gender that plants the seed or waters it.
The teaching would seem to be more relationship men and woman family affairs.... not the gospel .In that case of relationship teaching a woman should ask her husband and home and not other husbands in the assembling together. Same with men have a relationship problem ask your wife's at Home .In that way they together can concentrate on working together to perform the ceremonies as a representative glory to show the world and angels that long to look into salvation . As order in the temporal house of God..the head (Christ ) has spoken